Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1198411
Pre-market clinical evaluations of innovative high-risk medical devices in Europe.
Pre-market clinical evaluations of innovative high-risk medical devices in Europe. // International journal of technology assessment in health care, 28 (2012), 3; 278-284 doi:10.1017/S0266462312000335 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1198411 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Pre-market clinical evaluations of innovative
high-risk medical devices in
Europe.
Autori
Hulstaert, Frank ; Neyt, Mathias ; Vinck, Imgard ; Stordeur, Sabine ; Huić, Mirjana ; Sauerland, Stefan ; Kuijpers, Marja R ; Abrishami, Payam ; Vondeling, Hindrik ; Flamion, Bruno ; Garattini, Silvio ; Pavlovic Mira ; van Brabandt Hans
Izvornik
International journal of technology assessment in health care (0266-4623) 28
(2012), 3;
278-284
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Medical device ; Device approval ; Equipment and supplies ; European Union ; United States Food and Drug Administration
Sažetak
Objectives: High-quality clinical evidence is most often lacking when novel high-risk devices enter the European market. At the same time, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is often initiated as a requirement for obtaining market access in the US. Should coverage in Europe be postponed until RCT data are available? We studied the premarket clinical evaluation of innovative high-risk medical devices in Europe compared with the US, and with medicines, where appropriate. Methods: The literature and regulatory documents were checked. Representatives from industry, Competent Authorities, Notified Bodies, Ethics Committees, and HTA agencies were consulted. We also discuss patient safety and the transparency of information. Results: In contrast to the US, there is no requirement in Europe to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of high-risk devices in the premarket phase. Patients in Europe can thus have earlier access to a potentially lifesaving device, but at the risk of insufficiently documented efficacy and safety. Variations in the stringency of clinical reviews, both at the level of Notified Bodies and Competent Authorities, do not guarantee patient safety. We tried to document the design of premarket trials in Europe and number of patients exposed, but failed as this information is not made public. Furthermore, the Helsinki Declaration is not followed with respect to the registration and publication of premarket trials. Conclusions: For innovative high-risk devices, new EU legislation should require the premarket demonstration of clinical efficacy and safety, using an RCT if possible, and a transparent clinical review, preferably centralized.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE