Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1198409

Collaboration in health technology assessment (EUnetHTA joint action, 2010-2012): four case studies.


Huić, Mirjana; Nachtnebel, Anna; Zechmeister, Ingrid; Pasternak, Iris; Wild, Claudia
Collaboration in health technology assessment (EUnetHTA joint action, 2010-2012): four case studies. // International journal of technology assessment in health care, 29 (2013), 3; 323-330 doi:10.1017/S0266462313000305 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1198409 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Collaboration in health technology assessment (EUnetHTA joint action, 2010-2012): four case studies.

Autori
Huić, Mirjana ; Nachtnebel, Anna ; Zechmeister, Ingrid ; Pasternak, Iris ; Wild, Claudia

Izvornik
International journal of technology assessment in health care (0266-4623) 29 (2013), 3; 323-330

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Collaboration ; health technology assessment ; EUnetHTA ; case studies

Sažetak
Objectives: The aim of this study was to present the first four collaborative health technology assessment (HTA) processes on health technologies of different types and life cycles targeted toward diverse HTA users and facilitators, as well as the barriers of these collaborations. Methods: Retrospective analysis, through four case studies, was performed on the first four collaboration experiences of agencies participating in the EUnetHTA Joint Action project (2010-12), comprising different types and life cycles of health technologies for a diverse target audience, and different types of collaboration. The methods used to initiate collaboration, partner contributions, the assessment methodology, report structure, time frame, and factors acting as possible barriers to and facilitators of this collaboration were described. Results: Two ways were used to initiate collaboration in the first four collaborative HTA processes: active brokering of information, so- called "calls for collaboration, " and individual contact between agencies after identifying a topic common to two agencies in the Planned and Ongoing Projects database. Several success factors are recognized: predefined project management, high degree of commitment to the project ; adherence to timelines ; high relevance of technology ; a common understanding of the methods applied and advanced experience in HTA ; finally, acceptance of English- written reports by decision makers in non-English- speaking countries. Barriers like late identification of collaborative partners, nonacceptance of English language and different methodology of assessment should be overcome. Conclusions: Timely and efficient, different collaborative HTA processes on relative efficacy/effectiveness and safety on different types and life cycles of health technologies

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita



POVEZANOST RADA


Profili:

Avatar Url Mirjana Huić (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi www.cambridge.org

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Huić, Mirjana; Nachtnebel, Anna; Zechmeister, Ingrid; Pasternak, Iris; Wild, Claudia
Collaboration in health technology assessment (EUnetHTA joint action, 2010-2012): four case studies. // International journal of technology assessment in health care, 29 (2013), 3; 323-330 doi:10.1017/S0266462313000305 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Huić, M., Nachtnebel, A., Zechmeister, I., Pasternak, I. & Wild, C. (2013) Collaboration in health technology assessment (EUnetHTA joint action, 2010-2012): four case studies.. International journal of technology assessment in health care, 29 (3), 323-330 doi:10.1017/S0266462313000305.
@article{article, author = {Hui\'{c}, Mirjana and Nachtnebel, Anna and Zechmeister, Ingrid and Pasternak, Iris and Wild, Claudia}, year = {2013}, pages = {323-330}, DOI = {10.1017/S0266462313000305}, keywords = {Collaboration, health technology assessment, EUnetHTA, case studies}, journal = {International journal of technology assessment in health care}, doi = {10.1017/S0266462313000305}, volume = {29}, number = {3}, issn = {0266-4623}, title = {Collaboration in health technology assessment (EUnetHTA joint action, 2010-2012): four case studies.}, keyword = {Collaboration, health technology assessment, EUnetHTA, case studies} }
@article{article, author = {Hui\'{c}, Mirjana and Nachtnebel, Anna and Zechmeister, Ingrid and Pasternak, Iris and Wild, Claudia}, year = {2013}, pages = {323-330}, DOI = {10.1017/S0266462313000305}, keywords = {Collaboration, health technology assessment, EUnetHTA, case studies}, journal = {International journal of technology assessment in health care}, doi = {10.1017/S0266462313000305}, volume = {29}, number = {3}, issn = {0266-4623}, title = {Collaboration in health technology assessment (EUnetHTA joint action, 2010-2012): four case studies.}, keyword = {Collaboration, health technology assessment, EUnetHTA, case studies} }

Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font