Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1194672

The Reliability of Hacker’s Criteria for Determining Śaṅkara’s Authorship


Andrijanić, Ivan
The Reliability of Hacker’s Criteria for Determining Śaṅkara’s Authorship // Journal of Dharma Studies, 5 (2022), 83-105 doi:10.1007/s42240-022-00123-8 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1194672 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
The Reliability of Hacker’s Criteria for Determining Śaṅkara’s Authorship

Autori
Andrijanić, Ivan

Izvornik
Journal of Dharma Studies (2522-0926) 5 (2022); 83-105

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
advaita ; vedānta ; Śaṅkara ; Paul Hacker ; authorship ; monism

Sažetak
This paper discusses the reliability of the criteria for determining Śaṅkara’s authorship established by Paul Hacker. His analysis of terminological peculiarities is based on only one of Śaṅkara’s works—the commentary on the Brahma- Sūtras. Therefore, doubt arises as to whether these criteria also apply to other works that we can claim to be authentic. First, it will be argued that the commentaries on the Bṛhadāraṇyaka- and Taittirīya- Upaniṣad are works that can be— with reasonable certainty—considered authentic. When applied to these two works, Hacker’s criteria work remarkably well, and the commentaries on the Taittirīya- and Bṛhadāraṇyaka-Upaniṣad share the same terminological and conceptual features with the Brahma-Sūtra- Bhāṣya. Moreover, in most cases, it is possible to distinguish the usage of some terms and concepts from Sureśvara and Padmapāda. On the other hand, Sureśvara and Padmapāda use some of these terms in a quite similar way as Śaṅkara, but differently than the later Advaitins, indicating that a sharp line between Śaṅkara on the one hand and Sureśvara and Padmapāda on the other cannot be drawn in many cases. Also, the writings of these authors— especially Padmapāda— represent a transitional phase in the development of certain Advaita Vedānta concepts although the outlines of some peculiarities by which the later Advaita Vedānta differs from Śaṅkara can already be found sketched by Śaṅkara himself.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Filologija



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Ivan Andrijanić (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

Pristup cjelovitom tekstu rada doi www.academia.edu

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Andrijanić, Ivan
The Reliability of Hacker’s Criteria for Determining Śaṅkara’s Authorship // Journal of Dharma Studies, 5 (2022), 83-105 doi:10.1007/s42240-022-00123-8 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Andrijanić, I. (2022) The Reliability of Hacker’s Criteria for Determining Śaṅkara’s Authorship. Journal of Dharma Studies, 5, 83-105 doi:10.1007/s42240-022-00123-8.
@article{article, author = {Andrijani\'{c}, Ivan}, year = {2022}, pages = {83-105}, DOI = {10.1007/s42240-022-00123-8}, keywords = {advaita, ved\={a}nta, \'{S}aṅkara, Paul Hacker, authorship, monism}, journal = {Journal of Dharma Studies}, doi = {10.1007/s42240-022-00123-8}, volume = {5}, issn = {2522-0926}, title = {The Reliability of Hacker’s Criteria for Determining \'{S}aṅkara’s Authorship}, keyword = {advaita, ved\={a}nta, \'{S}aṅkara, Paul Hacker, authorship, monism} }
@article{article, author = {Andrijani\'{c}, Ivan}, year = {2022}, pages = {83-105}, DOI = {10.1007/s42240-022-00123-8}, keywords = {advaita, ved\={a}nta, \'{S}aṅkara, Paul Hacker, authorship, monism}, journal = {Journal of Dharma Studies}, doi = {10.1007/s42240-022-00123-8}, volume = {5}, issn = {2522-0926}, title = {The Reliability of Hacker’s Criteria for Determining \'{S}aṅkara’s Authorship}, keyword = {advaita, ved\={a}nta, \'{S}aṅkara, Paul Hacker, authorship, monism} }

Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font