Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1193955
A randomized double-blind, efficacy and safety study of PF-05280586 (a rituximab biosimilar) compared with rituximab reference product (MabThera®) in subjects with previously untreated CD20-positive, low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma (LTB-FL).
A randomized double-blind, efficacy and safety study of PF-05280586 (a rituximab biosimilar) compared with rituximab reference product (MabThera®) in subjects with previously untreated CD20-positive, low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma (LTB-FL). // Biodrugs, 34 (2020), 171-181 doi:10.1007/s40259-019-00398-7. (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1193955 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
A randomized double-blind, efficacy and safety
study of PF-05280586 (a rituximab biosimilar)
compared with rituximab reference product
(MabThera®) in subjects with previously untreated
CD20-positive, low-tumor-burden follicular
lymphoma (LTB-FL).
Autori
Sharman, JP ; Liberati, AM ; Ishizawa, K ; Khan, T ; Robbins, J ; Alcasid, A ; Rosenberg, JA ; Aurer, I
Izvornik
Biodrugs (1173-8804) 34
(2020);
171-181
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
follicular lymphoma ; rituximab ; biosimilar
Sažetak
Background: Biosimilars are highly similar to the licensed biologic ("reference product"), with no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, or potency between the two products. Objective: This comparative 52-week clinical study evaluated the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of PF-05280586 (Ruxience™ [a rituximab biosimilar]) versus rituximab reference product sourced from the EU (MabThera® ; rituximab-EU). Patients and methods: Subjects with CD20-positive, low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma (LTB-FL) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 were randomized (1:1) to PF-05280586 or rituximab-EU (375 mg/m2 intravenously [once weekly for 4 weeks at days 1, 8, 15, and 22]), stratified using the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index 2 classification. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at week 26 (percentage of subjects achieving complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]). Therapeutic equivalence was concluded if the two- sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in ORR between groups was within the prespecified margin (± 16%). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), CR rate, safety, immunogenicity, PK, and PD. Results: A total of 394 subjects were randomized: PF-05280586 (n = 196) or rituximab-EU (n = 198). ORR at week 26 was 75.5% (PF-05280586) versus 70.7% (rituximab-EU), for a difference of 4.66% ; 95% CI (- 4.16 to 13.47), which was entirely within the prespecified equivalence margin. Rates of CR were 29.3% (PF-05280586) versus 31.0% (rituximab-EU). Estimated 1-year PFS rates were 78.2% (95% CI 70.2-84.2) and 83.0% (95% CI 75.0- 88.6) for PF- 05280586 and rituximab-EU, respectively. Safety, immunogenicity, and mean serum concentrations were similar between groups. Conclusions: The efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, PK, and PD of PF-05280586 and rituximab-EU were similar up to week 52 in subjects with previously untreated CD20-positive LTB-FL.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Zagreb,
Klinički bolnički centar Zagreb
Profili:
Igor Aurer
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE