Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1193789
Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 2- hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyl cyanoacrylate contained in cosmetic glues among hairdressers and beauticians who perform nail treatments and eyelash extension as well as hair extension applications: A systematic review
Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 2- hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyl cyanoacrylate contained in cosmetic glues among hairdressers and beauticians who perform nail treatments and eyelash extension as well as hair extension applications: A systematic review // Contact dermatitis, 86 (2022), 480-492 doi:10.1111/cod.14056 (međunarodna recenzija, pregledni rad, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1193789 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 2-
hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyl cyanoacrylate
contained in cosmetic glues among hairdressers and
beauticians who perform nail treatments and
eyelash extension as well as hair extension
applications: A systematic review
Autori
Symanzik, Cara ; Weinert, Patricia ; Babić, Željka ; Hallmann, Sarah ; Havmose, S Martin ; Johansen, D Jeanne ; Kezic, Sanja ; Macan, Marija ; Macan, Jelena ; Strahwald, Julia ; Turk, Rajka ; van der Molen F Henk ; John, M Swen ; Uter, Wolfgang
Izvornik
Contact dermatitis (0105-1873) 86
(2022);
480-492
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, pregledni rad, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, contact dermatitis, ECA, ethyl cyanoacrylate, glue, hairdresser, HEMA, occupational, occupational diseases, skin diseases
Sažetak
Current cosmetic regulations primarily focus on protecting consumers, not the professional user who is subjected to a partly different, and certainly more intense exposure to hazardous substances. Against this background, this systematic review aims to compile and appraise evidence regarding skin toxicity of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA ; CAS no. 212-782-2) and ethyl cyanoacrylate (ECA ; CAS no. 7085-85-0) contained in cosmetic glues used among hairdressers and beauticians who perform nail treatments and eyelash extension as well as hair extension applications. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 recommendations for reporting systematic reviews and meta- analysis. In total, six publications from six countries were eligible for this systematic review. A meta-analysis revealed that hairdressers and beauticians have a ninefold increased risk of developing contact allergy to HEMA compared with controls who are not hairdressers and beauticians. Results for ECA are lacking. The results of this systematic review clearly show that—regarding contact allergy to acrylates—it is not appropriate to apply risk assessment for consumers to hairdressers and beauticians who occupationally handle cosmetic glues. The regulations in existence do not adequately address occupational risks for hairdressers and beauticians connected with the use of acrylate-containing cosmetic substances and need reconsideration.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Institut za medicinska istraživanja i medicinu rada, Zagreb
Profili:
Rajka Turk
(autor)
Jelena Macan
(autor)
Marija Macan
(autor)
Sanja Kežić
(autor)
Željka Babić
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE