Naslov
Application of Multi-criteria Analysis in the Choice of the Best Option of Sava Program

Autori
Skendrović, Vladimir ; Čulo, Ksenija

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni

Izvornik
14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ORGANIZATION, TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION AND 7 TH INTERNATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE / Završki, Ivica ; Cerić, Anita ; Vukomanović, Mladen ; Huemann, Martina ; Ronggui, Ding - Zagreb : Hrvatska Udruga za Organizaciju Građenja ; Fakultet strojarstva i brodogradnje Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 2019, 869-882

ISBN
978-953-7686-08-6

Skup
Trust in Major & Mega Projects

Mjesto i datum
Zagreb, Hrvatska, 04.09.2019. - 07.09.2019

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
evaluation of programs ; multi-criteria analysis ; analytic hierarchy process

Sažetak
Multi criteria analysis (MCA) is a family of algorithms used to select alternatives according to a set of different criteria and their relative ‘weights’. In contrast to CBA, which focuses on a unique criterion (the maximization of social welfare), MCA is a tool for dealing with a set of different objectives that cannot be simply aggregated as in standard CBA. MCA is appropriate for development programs, pursuing simultaneously different policy objectives rather than for the appraisal of a single investment project. The Program Sava is a complex project including a flood protection component, an energy component, a connectivity and accessibility component, and an urban regeneration component. Due to its technical complexity and its significant environmental, economic and social effects, a multi-criteria analysis was selected as the most appropriate to analyze the merit of the three technical solutions that had been studied during the last years. The applied methodology was based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the technique that is most commonly used in the world for a choice of options and the multi-criteria analysis process. Under this approach, weights were assigned to objectives. The total score for an option was then defined as the sum of the score for each objective multiplied by its weighting. This method assumes that the contribution of each criterion to the total score is independent on the scores for the other criteria. Finally, an Assessment Summary Table (AST) including 44 indicators of impact was prepared. The selected option was followed by cost and benefit analysis.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Građevinarstvo, Ekonomija

POVEZANOST RADA