Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1191483
Periodization of Architecture n Croatian Art History. The Case of the ‘Renaissance’ and ‘Transitional’ Styles
Periodization of Architecture n Croatian Art History. The Case of the ‘Renaissance’ and ‘Transitional’ Styles // Periodization in the Art Historiographies of Central and Eastern Europe / Kallestrup, Shona ; Kunińska, Magdalena ; Mihail, Mihnea Alexandru ; Adashinskaya, Anna ; Minea, Cosmin (ur.).
London : Delhi: Routledge ; Taylor & Francis, 2022. str. 141-155
CROSBI ID: 1191483 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Periodization of Architecture n Croatian Art
History. The Case of the ‘Renaissance’ and
‘Transitional’ Styles
(Periodization of Architecture in Croatian Art
History. The Case of the ‘Renaissance’ and
‘Transitional’ Styles)
Autori
Botica, Dubravka
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Poglavlja u knjigama, znanstveni
Knjiga
Periodization in the Art Historiographies of Central and Eastern Europe
Urednik/ci
Kallestrup, Shona ; Kunińska, Magdalena ; Mihail, Mihnea Alexandru ; Adashinskaya, Anna ; Minea, Cosmin
Izdavač
Routledge ; Taylor & Francis
Grad
London : Delhi
Godina
2022
Raspon stranica
141-155
ISBN
9781032013848
Ključne riječi
periodization, renaissance architecture, transitional style, late gothic style, nation-building
Sažetak
Periodization was a key issue of twentieth-century Croatian art history, considered within the paradigmatic framework of centre and periphery, as well as in relation to e¬orts to establish a ‘national’ element in pre- modern art. Stylistic periodization, as a fundamental concept of art history, has remained of prime importance ever since. In the interwar period, Ljubo Karaman (1886–1971) played a key role in interpreting Croatian art within the dominant centre–periphery paradigm, which had reached Croatia through the strong influence of the Vienna School of art history. Following the Second World War, this approach was continued by Cvito Fiskovic (1908– 1996) who nonetheless contested some of Karaman’s ideas and proposed a different periodization scheme, accompanied by a new interpretative research strategy focused on the role of ‘national’ artists. In the 1950s– the key formative period of culture and scholarship for the new state– art history, along with other fields in the humanities, operated within the recently established Socialist system. During this decade, art historians continued to promote the ‘national’ component in art and stressed the pre- eminence of local artists in relation to foreign ones. Discourses around periodization foregrounded the idea that tendencies in local art and Western art occurred simultaneously. Through analysis of key texts, this chapter explores how topics addressed in the debates between the two pillars of Croatian art history, Karaman and Fiskovic, received considerable attention in scholarly literature.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Arhitektura i urbanizam, Povijest umjetnosti
