Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1184591
National Identity and Market Freedoms After the Treaty of Lisbon
National Identity and Market Freedoms After the Treaty of Lisbon // Limitations of National Sovereignty through European Integration / Arnold, Rainer (ur.).
Dordrecht: Springer, 2016. str. 51-85 doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7471-0_4
CROSBI ID: 1184591 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
National Identity and Market Freedoms After the
Treaty of Lisbon
Autori
Rodin, Siniša
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Poglavlja u knjigama, znanstveni
Knjiga
Limitations of National Sovereignty through European Integration
Urednik/ci
Arnold, Rainer
Izdavač
Springer
Grad
Dordrecht
Godina
2016
Raspon stranica
51-85
ISBN
978-94-017-7469-7
Ključne riječi
European Union ; Treaty of Lisbon ; constitutionalism ; national identity ; EU law ; supremacy
Sažetak
The aim of this paper is to explore the balance between market freedoms and national regulatory autonomy following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, particularly in the light of the rephrased national identity guarantee under Article 4(2) TEU. The paper will discuss whether the newly established obligation of the European Union to respect the national identities of its Member States has any consequences in the case law of the European Court of Justice. Arguably, defining the proper scope of application of the national identity guarantee is relevant to the application of EU law, since it disturbs the previously established balance between European and national law. If defined too broadly, it can undermine the uniform application and effectiveness of EU law. If defined too narrowly, it would be devoid of any useful effect. With this objective in mind, the paper will first clarify the concept of national identity and, more specifically, national constitutional identity. Second, it will discuss the case law of the CJEU preceding the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon. In this part, it will be suggested that the development of national identity law before the Treaty of Lisbon went through three evolutionary phases: a phase of early and implicit national identity law ; a phase in which the CJEU developed the margin of discretion doctrine ; and a phase in which the CJEU started to differentiate national constitutional rules and accord them different levels of scrutiny. In the third part, the paper will explore whether there have been significant developments in the national identity case law of the CJEU after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, and suggest that the general approach of the CJEU has not significantly changed. It will also be argued that the main developments related to Article 4(2) TEU have not taken place before the CJEU, but in national arenas, notably in France and Germany. In the fourth and final part, the paper will return to the issue of the differentiation of national identity claims and conclude that one category is understood by the CJEU as an ordinary justification of national measures restricting one of the market freedoms, while the other category of claims prompts the CJEU to defer to national authorities.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Book Citation Index - Social Sciences & Humanities (BKCI-SSH)