Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1182436
Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans
Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans // International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (2022), 5; 2539, 14 doi:10.3390/ijms23052539 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1182436 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium
Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket
Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative
Histologic Study in Humans
Autori
Čandrlić, Marija ; Tomas, Matej ; Karl, Matej ; Malešić, Lucija ; Včev, Aleksandar ; Perić Kačarević, Željka ; Matijević, Marko
Izvornik
International Journal of Molecular Sciences (1422-0067) 23
(2022), 5;
2539, 14
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
socket preservation ; guided bone regeneration ; biphasic calcium phosphate ; xenograft ; tissue engineering ; qualitative histology ; quantitative histology
Sažetak
This study is the first histologic evaluation of an injectable biphasic calcium phosphate (IBCP) in humans six months after socket preservation according to the principles of guided bone regeneration. After tooth extraction, the alveolar ridge of 21 patients was augmented with IBCP (maxresorb® inject) in the test group, while 20 patients in the control group received a bovine xenograft (BX) (cerabone®). Six months after augmentation, a reentry procedure was performed to collect biopsies of regenerated bone for qualitative and quantitative histologic analysis. A total of 20 biopsies were taken for analysis. Qualitative histologic analysis showed complete integration of the biomaterial and no inflammatory tissue reaction, indicating the biocompatibility of the bone grafts and the surrounding tissue in both groups. Histomorphometric analysis showed comparable results in terms of newly formed bone (IBCP: 26.47 ± 14.71%, BX: 30.47 ± 16.39%) and residual biomaterial (IBCP: 13.1 ± 14.07%, BX: 17.89 ± 11.81%), with no significant difference found across groups (p > 0.05, Mann—Whitney U test). Statistical significance between groups was found in the result of soft tissue percentage (IBCP: 60.43 ± 12.73%, BX: 51.64 ± 14.63%, p = 0.046, Mann—Whitney U test). To conclude, IBCP and BX showed good osteoconductivity and biocompatibility with comparable new bone formation six months after alveolar ridge preservation.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Temeljne medicinske znanosti, Dentalna medicina
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka,
Fakultet za dentalnu medicinu i zdravstvo, Osijek
Profili:
Marko Matijević
(autor)
Željka Perić Kačarević
(autor)
Aleksandar Včev
(autor)
Marija Čandrlić
(autor)
Matej Tomas
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE