Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1178813
Master Buvina's Door – A Unique Testimony to the Paradigm Shift in the Theory of Monument Protection and Methodological Experimentation
Master Buvina's Door – A Unique Testimony to the Paradigm Shift in the Theory of Monument Protection and Methodological Experimentation // Vratnice Andrije Buvine u Splitskoj katedrali 1214.– 2014. / Cambi, Nenad et al. (ur.).
Split : Zagreb: Književni krug Split, Institut za povijest umjetnosti, 2020. str. 161-188
CROSBI ID: 1178813 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Master Buvina's Door – A Unique Testimony to the
Paradigm Shift in the Theory of Monument
Protection and Methodological Experimentation
Autori
Ćorić, Franko
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Poglavlja u knjigama, znanstveni
Knjiga
Vratnice Andrije Buvine u Splitskoj katedrali 1214.– 2014.
Urednik/ci
Cambi, Nenad et al.
Izdavač
Književni krug Split, Institut za povijest umjetnosti
Grad
Split : Zagreb
Godina
2020
Raspon stranica
161-188
ISBN
978-953-163-497-7
Ključne riječi
Split Cathedral ; Buvina’s Door ; Central Commission ; restoration ; preservation of the age value ; Max Dvořák ; Antonin Švimberský
Sažetak
The monumental Romanesque door of the Split Cathedral, the work of Master Andrija Buvina from 1214, was restored in 1908. The key figures in the renovation of Buvina’s door were Antonin Švimberský, a technician and teacher at the Wood Processing School in the Czech town of Chrudim, and Max Dvořák, an art historian and Chief Conservator of the Second Department of the Imperial and Royal Central Commission (predecessor of the Austrian Federal Conservation Institute – Bundesdenkmalamt). Dvořák developed renovation guidelines that respected the principle of preservation of the age value as described by Alois Riegl. Švimberský, an expert in wood processing in his time, treated the Romanesque door as a wooden object still in function. The interventions on the door leaves were marked by a theoretical-methodological triangle between the established practice of stylistic restoration, the search for the methodology of a new, conservation- driven theoretical paradigm in the protection of cultural heritage (the so-called Moderne Denkmalpflege), and personal preferences and understandings of Švimberský himself, as well as most likely by practical and pragmatic solutions involved within the enormous work done in five months.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Povijest umjetnosti