Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1178634
Principles in the Service of Conception and Protection of the Right to Live in a Healthy Environment: (In)Consistency of the European Court’s Case-Law
Principles in the Service of Conception and Protection of the Right to Live in a Healthy Environment: (In)Consistency of the European Court’s Case-Law // Property law: Challenges of the 21 century's: Proceedings: International Scientific Conference / Simić, Jelena ; Radonjić, Aleksa (ur.).
Beograd: Union University School of Law,, 2021. str. 263-288 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1178634 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Principles in the Service of Conception
and Protection of the Right to Live in a Healthy
Environment: (In)Consistency of the European
Court’s Case-Law
Autori
Marochini Zrinski, Maša
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Property law: Challenges of the 21 century's: Proceedings: International Scientific Conference
/ Simić, Jelena ; Radonjić, Aleksa - Beograd : Union University School of Law,, 2021, 263-288
ISBN
978-86-7952-060-9
Skup
International Scientific Conference "Property Law: challenges of the 21st Century"
Mjesto i datum
Beograd, Srbija, 09.10.2020. - 09.10.2020
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
right to live in a healthy environment ; interpretative methods and principles ; inconsistency of the European Court’s case-law.
Sažetak
During the last two decades, the European Court of Human Rights has increasingly examined complaints where individuals have argued that a breach of their Convention rights has resulted from adverse environmental factors. Since healthy environment per se is not protected under the Convention, the Court decided environmental cases on a caseby- case basis, mainly under Article 8 concerning the right to private and family life, home and correspondence. Therefore, the Convention practice in the protection of these rights that would in traditional proprietary law be sought as protection from emissions or from the disturbance of property, has thus been given a new, Convention dimension. However, in those cases the Court did not set out clear standards or guidelines, thus contributing to states’ uncertainty regarding their obligations under the Convention, as well as to the Court’s own inconsistency that is ultimately threatening its legitimacy. This paper will look at the Court’s environmental cases through the lenses of interpretative methods and principles, and analyse certain aspects of its (in)consistency when delivering judgments concerning the right to live in a healthy environment.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
