Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1169931
Intellectual circle of Milovan Gavazzi and the Croatian ethnology in the period of 1945 to 1970
Intellectual circle of Milovan Gavazzi and the Croatian ethnology in the period of 1945 to 1970 // SIEF 2021 15th Congress : Breaking the rules? Power, participation, transgression
Helsinki: SIEF, 2021. 59349, 1 (predavanje, podatak o recenziji nije dostupan, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1169931 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Intellectual circle of Milovan Gavazzi and the
Croatian ethnology in the period of 1945 to 1970
Autori
Grkeš, Ivan ; Petrović Leš, Tihana
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
SIEF 2021 15th Congress : Breaking the rules? Power, participation, transgression
/ - Helsinki : SIEF, 2021
Skup
15th Congress "Breaking the rules? Power, participation, transgression" (SIEF2021 )
Mjesto i datum
Helsinki, Finska, 19.06.2021. - 24.06.2021
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Podatak o recenziji nije dostupan
Ključne riječi
Milovan Gavazzi, hrvatska etnologija, socijalizam
(Milovan Gavazzi, Croatian Ethnology, Socialism)
Sažetak
The events that happened after the Second World War brought a series of changes in the political, social and cultural life of Croatia within the newly created socialist Yugoslavia. Following the Soviet model, the new regime sought to introduce a number of changes in education and science through legislation and through ideologization and politicization. That led to introducing the Marxist paradigm into the scientific discourse, but also to the opportunity to open up new research areas. Despite the pressures, there were no significant qualitative changes in the theoretical and methodological sense in Croatian ethnology until the early 1970s. The reason for that should certainly be sought in the political events within socialist Yugoslavia shortly after the end of the war, but also in the influence of ethnologist Milovan Gavazzi and his intellectual circle on the trends within the profession. Based on the current research data, in this paper we will focus on three research questions: 1) why were there no significant changes within the existing institutions related to ethnology after the Second World War ?, 2) what was the role of Milovan Gavazzi and his circle in the development of the profession and maintaining the status quo ?, and 3) to what extent did the scientific contacts of Croatian ethnologists with their foreign colleagues influence the emergence of new research directions within the profession in the 1970s? The answers to the posed questions will be given from the perspective of Bourdieu's field theory.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Etnologija i antropologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb