Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1152522

What do We Really Know About the First Performance of Gorboduc?


Lupić, Ivan
What do We Really Know About the First Performance of Gorboduc? // Sixteenth Century Society Conference
San Juan, Portoriko, 2013. (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, ostalo, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1152522 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
What do We Really Know About the First Performance of Gorboduc?

Autori
Lupić, Ivan

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, ostalo, znanstveni

Skup
Sixteenth Century Society Conference

Mjesto i datum
San Juan, Portoriko, 24.10.2013. - 27.10.2013

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
Gorboduc ; theatrical performance ; manuscript evidence ; political culture

Sažetak
In the early 1990s, literary scholars became aware of the existence of a sixteenth-century manuscript (today British Library Additional MS 48023) containing a fascinating, though brief, description of the first performance of Thomas Sackville and Thomas Norton’s Tragedy of Gorboduc, first published in print in 1565 but originally staged as part of the Inner Temple Christmas revels in 1561. The divergence between the manuscript account and the evidence of the printed texts has led scholars to suppose that the text of the play as we have it might not be identical to the text actually performed in the Inner Temple and that the original production might have introduced significant topical, mostly political, elements not surviving into the printed texts. These interpretations regularly assume that what the manuscript in question contains is an eyewitness account of the first performance of Gorboduc. My presentation situates the account of the performance within the context of the entire manuscript to argue that it was obtained by the compiler of the manuscript at second hand and that its status as an eyewitness account is dubious. The compiler of the manuscript, I suggest, was not so much interested in Gorboduc as he was obsessed with certain aspects of the political culture of the 1560s. His obsessions need to be carefully considered in our assessment of the evidentiary value of the manuscript, and especially of its account of the first performance of Gorboduc.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Filologija, Povijest, Interdisciplinarne humanističke znanosti, Kazališna umjetnost (scenske i medijske umjetnosti)



POVEZANOST RADA


Profili:

Avatar Url Ivan Lupić (autor)


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Lupić, Ivan
What do We Really Know About the First Performance of Gorboduc? // Sixteenth Century Society Conference
San Juan, Portoriko, 2013. (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, ostalo, znanstveni)
Lupić, I. (2013) What do We Really Know About the First Performance of Gorboduc?. U: Sixteenth Century Society Conference.
@article{article, author = {Lupi\'{c}, Ivan}, year = {2013}, keywords = {Gorboduc, theatrical performance, manuscript evidence, political culture}, title = {What do We Really Know About the First Performance of Gorboduc?}, keyword = {Gorboduc, theatrical performance, manuscript evidence, political culture}, publisherplace = {San Juan, Portoriko} }
@article{article, author = {Lupi\'{c}, Ivan}, year = {2013}, keywords = {Gorboduc, theatrical performance, manuscript evidence, political culture}, title = {What do We Really Know About the First Performance of Gorboduc?}, keyword = {Gorboduc, theatrical performance, manuscript evidence, political culture}, publisherplace = {San Juan, Portoriko} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font