Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1151463

The Composite Quality Score (CQS) as a trial appraisal tool: inter-rater reliability and rating time


Mickenautsch, Steffen; Miletić, Ivana; Rupf, Stefan; Renteria, Jone; Göstemeyer, Gerd
The Composite Quality Score (CQS) as a trial appraisal tool: inter-rater reliability and rating time // Clinical oral investigations, 25 (2021), 10; 6015-6023 doi:10.1007/s00784-021-04099-w (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1151463 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
The Composite Quality Score (CQS) as a trial appraisal tool: inter-rater reliability and rating time

Autori
Mickenautsch, Steffen ; Miletić, Ivana ; Rupf, Stefan ; Renteria, Jone ; Göstemeyer, Gerd

Izvornik
Clinical oral investigations (1432-6981) 25 (2021), 10; 6015-6023

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Clinical trial appraisal ; Composite quality score ; Inter-rater reliability ; Therapy trials

Sažetak
Objective: To establish the CQS inter-rater reliability and rating time and to compare both against that of the Jadad scale and Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool (ROBT). Material and methods: Four independent raters rated 45 trial reports. The inter-rater reliability was established by use of the Brennan- Prediger coefficient (BPC). The coefficients were compared using the two-sample z- test. Secondary analysis included comparison of the inter-rater reliability of the randomization component of all tools, as well as of the allocation concealment component of the CQS to that of the ROBT. The mean rating time with standard deviation (SD) for each tool was determined using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Post hoc comparisons were made using the Tukey-Kramer adjustment for three pair-wise multiple comparisons. Results: The inter-rater reliability was significantly higher for the CQS (BPC, 95% CI: 0.95, 0.87-1.00) compared to Jadad (0.70, 0.58- 0.82) (adjusted p = 0.0005) and most components of ROBT. The mean (SD) time to complete the CQS (4.0 (1.0) min) did not differ significantly from that of the Jadad scale 4.8 (1.1) min (adjusted p = 0.11), but was significantly shorter compared to that of the ROBT 15.3 (5.9) min (adjusted p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The results suggest the CQS to be a very reliable and fast trial appraisal tool. Clinical relevance The higher the inter-rater reliability, the higher the probability that trial results reflect therapeutic truth. The CQS will need to take further bias sources into consideration, in order to increase its utility.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Dentalna medicina



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Stomatološki fakultet, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Ivana Miletić (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi link.springer.com

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Mickenautsch, Steffen; Miletić, Ivana; Rupf, Stefan; Renteria, Jone; Göstemeyer, Gerd
The Composite Quality Score (CQS) as a trial appraisal tool: inter-rater reliability and rating time // Clinical oral investigations, 25 (2021), 10; 6015-6023 doi:10.1007/s00784-021-04099-w (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Mickenautsch, S., Miletić, I., Rupf, S., Renteria, J. & Göstemeyer, G. (2021) The Composite Quality Score (CQS) as a trial appraisal tool: inter-rater reliability and rating time. Clinical oral investigations, 25 (10), 6015-6023 doi:10.1007/s00784-021-04099-w.
@article{article, author = {Mickenautsch, Steffen and Mileti\'{c}, Ivana and Rupf, Stefan and Renteria, Jone and G\"{o}stemeyer, Gerd}, year = {2021}, pages = {6015-6023}, DOI = {10.1007/s00784-021-04099-w}, keywords = {Clinical trial appraisal, Composite quality score, Inter-rater reliability, Therapy trials}, journal = {Clinical oral investigations}, doi = {10.1007/s00784-021-04099-w}, volume = {25}, number = {10}, issn = {1432-6981}, title = {The Composite Quality Score (CQS) as a trial appraisal tool: inter-rater reliability and rating time}, keyword = {Clinical trial appraisal, Composite quality score, Inter-rater reliability, Therapy trials} }
@article{article, author = {Mickenautsch, Steffen and Mileti\'{c}, Ivana and Rupf, Stefan and Renteria, Jone and G\"{o}stemeyer, Gerd}, year = {2021}, pages = {6015-6023}, DOI = {10.1007/s00784-021-04099-w}, keywords = {Clinical trial appraisal, Composite quality score, Inter-rater reliability, Therapy trials}, journal = {Clinical oral investigations}, doi = {10.1007/s00784-021-04099-w}, volume = {25}, number = {10}, issn = {1432-6981}, title = {The Composite Quality Score (CQS) as a trial appraisal tool: inter-rater reliability and rating time}, keyword = {Clinical trial appraisal, Composite quality score, Inter-rater reliability, Therapy trials} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font