Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1149749
Comparison of Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q and Schwind Amaris 750S excimer laser in treatment of high astigmatism
Comparison of Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q and Schwind Amaris 750S excimer laser in treatment of high astigmatism // Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 252 (2014), 10; 1679-1686 doi:10.1007/s00417-014-2776-2 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1149749 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparison of Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q and
Schwind Amaris 750S excimer laser in treatment of
high astigmatism
Autori
Bohac, Maja ; Biscevic, Alma ; Koncarevic, Mateja ; Anticic, Marija ; Gabric, Nikica ; Patel, Sudi
Izvornik
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (0721-832X) 252
(2014), 10;
1679-1686
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Astigmatism . LASIK . Excimer laser . Ablation profile . High-order aberrations
Sažetak
Purpose To compare functional outcomes of Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q 400Hz and Schwind Amaris 750S excimer laser for astigmatism between 2 and 7 diopters(D). Methods Prospective comparative non-randomized case series of 480 eyes assigned in two laser groups and further divided into myopic and mixed astigmatism subgroups. All treatments were centered on corneal vertex. One-year results were compared between the groups. Statistical analysis was performed using z-test. Results Both Allegretto and Amaris postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) improved in comparison to preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). The difference was significant in the Allegretto group for myopic astigmatism (p=0.017). There was no difference in postoperative UDVA between lasers. Average sphere decreased in all groups for both lasers (p<0.001) without difference in effectiveness of spherical correction between lasers for both groups. In Allegretto, average cylinder decreased from −3.30D to −0.55D in myopic astigmatism (p<0.001) and from −3.84D to −0.85D in mixed astigmatism (p<0.001). In Amaris average cylinder decreased from −3.21D to −0.43D in myopic astigmatism (p<0.001) and from −3.66D to −0.58D in mixed astigmatism (p<0.001). Amaris group had less residual astigmatism (myopic astigmatism p= 0.023, mixed astigmatism p<0.001). Mean spherical aberration shifted from positive to negative in mixed astigmatism for both lasers. Conclusion Both lasers are effective in terms of UDVA, CDVA, spherical correction, and preservation of high-order aberrations. However, Amaris was more effective in cylinder correction.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka,
Specijalna bolnica Svjetlost
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE