Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1146545
DETERMINING CRITERIA AND SUB-CRITERIA WEIGHTS FOR THE SELECTION OF REGIONAL CENTERS OF COMPETENCE IN CROATIA
DETERMINING CRITERIA AND SUB-CRITERIA WEIGHTS FOR THE SELECTION OF REGIONAL CENTERS OF COMPETENCE IN CROATIA // International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP 2020)
online: Creative Decisions Foundation, 2020. str. - doi:10.13033/isahp.y2020.029 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, kratko priopćenje, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1146545 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
DETERMINING CRITERIA AND SUB-CRITERIA WEIGHTS FOR
THE SELECTION OF REGIONAL CENTERS OF COMPETENCE IN
CROATIA
Autori
Zugec, Bojan ; Universty of Zagreb, Faculty of organization and informatics ; Divjak, Blazenka ; Begicevic Redjep, Nina ; University of Zagreb, Faculty of organization and informatics ; University of Zagreb, Faculty of organization and informatics
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, kratko priopćenje, znanstveni
Skup
International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP 2020)
Mjesto i datum
Online, 03.12.2020. - 06.12.2020
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
analytic hierarchy process ; group decision making ; government ; education
Sažetak
In this paper, a process of determining the criteria and sub-criteria weights for the selection of Regional Centers of Competence (RCC) in sector of vocational education is described. In 2018, the Croatian Ministry of Science and Education was responsible for creating a document comprising all parameters and criteria for this selection, named The Network of Regional Centers of Competence, and requested assistance in determining the criteria and sub-criteria weights to be incorporated within. The criteria were predefined pursuant to the national Vocational Education and Training Act and, to determine the weights, the AHP decision making group of the members of the Council for Vocational Education were engaged. There were 10 criteria with the total of 64 sub-criteria in this process, and to make it more efficient, pairwise comparison was made for the criteria and an inverse ranking method for the sub-criteria weights. Because of the enhanced number of pairwise comparisons, it was quite challenging for some decision makers to stay consistent. Therefore, the inconsistency coefficient was used to calculate the decision makers’ weights, to incorporate the reliability of their comparisons in the overall process.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski