Naslov
Applicability of Field Aerobic Fitness Tests in Soccer: Which One to Choose?

Autori
Bok, Daniel ; Foster, Carl

Izvornik
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology (2411-5142) 6 (2021), 3; 1-23

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, pregledni rad, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
30-15 intermittent fitness test ; Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test ; 20-m shuttle run test ; University of Montreal track test ; Vam Eval test ; maximal aerobic speed ; exercise prescription ; validity ; reliability ; sensitivity ; usefulness

Sažetak
A desire to make fitness testing cheaper and easier to conduct in a team-sport setting has led to the development of numerous field aerobic fitness tests. This has contributed to a growing confusion among strength and conditioning coaches about which one to use. The main aim of this narrative review was to examine the reliability, validity, sensitivity and usefulness of the commonly used field aerobic fitness tests and to provide practical guidelines for their use in soccer. The University of Montreal track test (UMTT) and Vam Eval test seem the best options for estimation of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) while the highest signal-to-noise ratio of the 30-15 intermittent fitness test (30-15IFT) suggests its superior sensitivity to track changes in fitness. The UMTT and 30-15IFT are the best solutions for prescription of long and short high-intensity interval training sessions, respectively. All field tests mostly present with marginal usefulness, but the smallest worthwhile change for UMTT or Vam Eval test, Yo-YoIRT2 and 30-15IFT are smaller than their stage increment making the improvement of only one stage in the test performance already worthwhile. Strength and conditioning coaches are advised to choose the test based on their specific purpose of testing.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kineziologija

POVEZANOST RADA