Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1138343
Re-Reading Estlund: In Defense of Moderate Epistemic Proceduralism
Re-Reading Estlund: In Defense of Moderate Epistemic Proceduralism // Etica & politica = Ethics and politics, 23 (2021), 2; 423-440 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1138343 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Re-Reading Estlund: In Defense of Moderate
Epistemic Proceduralism
Autori
Cerovac, Ivan
Izvornik
Etica & politica = Ethics and politics (1825-5167) 23
(2021), 2;
423-440
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Legitimacy, Authority, Epistemic democracy, Epistemic proceduralism, Estlund, Division of epistemic labor, Rawls
Sažetak
This paper engages an elaborate critique that Prijić-Samaržija uses to disqualify moderate epistemic proceduralism as a proper approach to political legitimacy. The paper offers an alternative interpretation of Estlund's position, arguing that his position (contrary to Prijić- Samaržija's reading) represents a veritist account that locates procedure's epistemic value in its ability to produce the correct outcome. Furthermore, by introducing the distinction between collective decision-making procedures and collective decision-authorization procedures, it argues that moderate epistemic proceduralism can accommodate the special role of experts in its theoretical framework.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Politologija, Filozofija
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
HRZZ-IP-2018-01-3518 - Odgovori na antisocijalne osobnosti u demokratskom društvu (RAD) (Malatesti, Luca, HRZZ ) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Rijeka
Profili:
Ivan Cerovac
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
- Scopus
