Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1134401
REGULATING CROWDFUNDING IN THE EU – SAME RULES, SAME RESULTS? CASE STUDY OF CROATIA
REGULATING CROWDFUNDING IN THE EU – SAME RULES, SAME RESULTS? CASE STUDY OF CROATIA // Balkan social science review, 17 (2021), 7-25 doi:10.46763/BSSR (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1134401 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
REGULATING CROWDFUNDING IN THE EU – SAME RULES,
SAME RESULTS? CASE STUDY OF CROATIA
Autori
Bajakić, Ivana ; Božina Beroš, Marta ; Grdović Gnip, Ana
Izvornik
Balkan social science review (1857-8799) 17
(2021);
7-25
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
crowdfunding, FinTech, European financial regulation, Croatia, capital markets
Sažetak
Fintech embodies technological innovations in financial services. The scholarship in this area is fast-growing and correlates with a disruptive potential Fintech has for the financial ecosystem. European regulation is also keeping up with this phenomenon. A case in point is the recently adopted EU crowdfunding regulation which is part of the EU’s FinTech Action Plan and Capital Markets Union agenda. Its general goal is to promote financial development of European financial systems by enhancing alternative finance sources to bank lending and cross-border investments. On the one hand, the EU crowdfunding regulation aims to enhance scalability for crowdfunding platforms service providers across the European single market through a single EU crowdfunding licence. On the other hand, regulation intends to provide a high level of investor protection across Europe through a unified set of rules. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, to outline the European regulatory and policy agenda in addressing disruptive impacts of FinTech and crowdfunding on capital markets. Second, to open and encourage timely policy discussions on how these regulatory trends could unfold in Croatia and the South Eastern European (SEE) region, characterised as more traditional financial markets services and developing capital markets in comparison to other member states. Thus, the methodology combines secondary data analysis with a case study. Our findings suggest that the likely effects of the EU crowdfunding regulation reflect in improved legal certainty for investors and increased potential for financial development in alternative financing, although there is significant space for improvement of the Croatian financial ecosystem.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Ekonomija, Pravo
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Zagreb,
Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile u Puli
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Scopus
- HeinOnline