Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1129773
Predictions of State and County Top Civil Servants Regarding the Abolition of County State Administration Offices: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
Predictions of State and County Top Civil Servants Regarding the Abolition of County State Administration Offices: Two Sides of the Same Coin? // Central European public administration review = Srednjeevropska revija za javno upravo, 19 (2021), 1; 41-61 doi:10.17573/cepar.2021.1.02 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1129773 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Predictions of State and County Top Civil
Servants Regarding the Abolition of County State
Administration Offices: Two Sides of the Same
Coin?
Autori
Lopižić, Iva ; Manojlović Toman, Romea
Izvornik
Central European public administration review = Srednjeevropska revija za javno upravo (2591-2240) 19
(2021), 1;
41-61
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
civil servants’ predictions ; abolition of county state administration offices ; administrative decentralization ; factors of cognitive biases
Sažetak
In January 2020, county state administration offices, as first-line state administration offices in Croatia, were abolished and their competences transferred to county second-level units of local self-government. This or- ganizational change represents administrative decentralization. The pur-pose of this article is to examine whether there are any differences in the predictions regarding the effects of this organizational change between two groups of civil servants: state civil servants (heads of county state ad-ministration offices and heads of their internal organizational units) and county civil servants (heads of county organizational units), and which are the factors that shape their predictions. A questionnaire was sent to the respondents in June 2019. The statistical analysis of the data (response rate 52%) shows a statistically significant difference between the predic-tions of the two groups in relation to all four categories of effects of this organizational change (inputs, processes, outputs, and outcomes). There is only one point where there is no difference: both groups agree that the county governor’s role will grow. The difference in predictions is ex-plained by two factors of cognitive biases: the organization’s interest to survive and expand its power, and uncertainty (strategic, structural, and job-related). The paper offers an academic contribution to the field of administrative decentralization by giving insights into the predictions of different actors on the effects of such change before its implementation and by introducing factors of cognitive biases as explanations for discrep- ancies in the predictions.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Zagreb
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
- HeinOnline