Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1129578
Between a formalist and a realist jurisprudence in the EU
Between a formalist and a realist jurisprudence in the EU // Opening the Black Box of Precedent and Case-Based Reasoning
Beč, Austrija, 2019. (pozvano predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, neobjavljeni rad, ostalo)
CROSBI ID: 1129578 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Between a formalist and a realist jurisprudence in
the EU
Autori
Bačić Selanec, Nika
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, neobjavljeni rad, ostalo
Skup
Opening the Black Box of Precedent and Case-Based Reasoning
Mjesto i datum
Beč, Austrija, 18.01.2019. - 19.01.2019
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Pozvano predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
Legal Formalism, Legal Realism, Court of Justice, Adjudication, EU law, Jurisprudence
Sažetak
EU legal culture operates under a perplexing formalist façade. Being deeply influenced by positivist tradition in Europe, it requires all judicial developments of EU law to be traced back to the legal grounds within the Treaties and its text. In turn, to respond to textual indeterminacies, the EU method relies heavily on teleological interpretation of the law, reminiscent of a Dworkinian ideal of community values capable of resolving all legal problems the system encounters in a principled manner. This paper in contrast argues that, beneath the surface, CJEU jurisprudence conforms to the assumptions posed by the theory of legal realism, both in terms of its judicial lawmaking and policymaking. The inherent indeterminacy of EU law combined with far- reaching effects of CJEU’s jurisprudence prove the merits of the realist critique of adjudication, which has in the EU context been significantly and unduly overlooked.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
