Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1128279
Conflict and facilitation in visual cognition: A dual-process approach
Conflict and facilitation in visual cognition: A dual-process approach // Proceedings of the XXVI Scientific Conference – Empirical Studies in Psychology / Videnović, Marina ; Stepanović Ilić, Ivana ; Simić, Nataša ; Rajić, Milana (ur.).
Beograd: Institute of Psychology ; Laboratory for Experimental Psychology (LEP), 2020. str. 107-111 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1128279 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Conflict and facilitation in visual cognition: A dual-process approach
Autori
Valerjev, Pavle ; Dujmović, Marin
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Proceedings of the XXVI Scientific Conference – Empirical Studies in Psychology
/ Videnović, Marina ; Stepanović Ilić, Ivana ; Simić, Nataša ; Rajić, Milana - Beograd : Institute of Psychology ; Laboratory for Experimental Psychology (LEP), 2020, 107-111
ISBN
978-86-6427-165-3
Skup
26. naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji = 26th Empirical Studies in Psychology Conference
Mjesto i datum
Beograd, Srbija, 15.10.2020. - 18.10.2020
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
Gestalt grouping, visual cognition, scene segmentation, dual-process theory, Visual Grouping Conflict task
Sažetak
Conflict monitoring, detection and resolution have been key foci of research within the dual-process framework of reasoning. The current study attempts to bridge the gap between classic reasoning and visual reasoning by applying a similar testing paradigm to determine whether the two rely on similar principles and processes. Participants were asked to accept or reject a cue number depending on whether it represents the actual number of stimuli (black circles) shown on the screen. The key manipulation leaves stimuli equidistant or groups them in multiple groups based on proximity. In the latter case, Gestalt processes lead to different judgments when compared to stimuli segmentation and this was exploited to observe the effects of congruence on accuracy and response times. The results show participants were less accurate and slower in conflict conditions which implies similar principles as in classic cognitive reasoning tasks. The findings demonstrate how visual cognition processes that run in parallel can interfere with one another. In such cases conflict resolution process are activated in order to settle on a response.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Psihologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
NadSve-Sveučilište u Rijeci-uniri-drustv-18-181 - Metakognitivni procesi u učenju i zaključivanju (Bajšanski, Igor, NadSve - UNIRI Sredstva potpore znanstvenim istraživanjima) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Sveučilište u Zadru
Profili:
Pavle Valerjev
(autor)