Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1116235

A comparison of two paradigms for implicit power motive measurement in predicting organizational leadership criteria


Galić, Zvonimir; Trojak, Nataša; Ružojčić, Mitja
A comparison of two paradigms for implicit power motive measurement in predicting organizational leadership criteria // 19th EAWOP Congress Abstract Book
Torino, Italija, 2019. str. 171-171 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1116235 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
A comparison of two paradigms for implicit power motive measurement in predicting organizational leadership criteria

Autori
Galić, Zvonimir ; Trojak, Nataša ; Ružojčić, Mitja

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni

Izvornik
19th EAWOP Congress Abstract Book / - , 2019, 171-171

Skup
19th EAWOP congress

Mjesto i datum
Torino, Italija, 29.05.2019. - 01.06.2019

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
Power motive ; Conditional Reasoning Test ; Implicit Association Test ; leadership

Sažetak
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the validity of the Conditional Reasoning Test for Power motive (CRT-P), and an implicit power motive test based on the Implicit Association Test paradigm (IAT-P) in explaining organizational leadership criteria. Design/Methodology/Approach/Intervention. We conducted a study on a sample of Croatian managers of small businesses (N = 66) and their subordinates (N = 194). Managers’ implicit power motive was captured with the CRT-P and IAT-P, and their explicit power motive was assessed with a self-report questionnaire. We also collected managers’ self-reports and subordinates’ reports about the managers’ 172 effectiveness (ME). Also, subordinates self- reported about perceived organizational support (POS), and their task performance (TP) and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs). Results Multi-level analyses showed that CRT-P scores correlated positively with subordinates’ ME ratings and POS, and negatively with subordinates’ CWBs. At the same time, IAT-P scores were significantly related only to ME self-ratings. All relations held when self- reported power motive was controlled for. Limitations Both studies were conducted on a relatively small sample of managers, and the effects were generally small in size. Research/Practical Implications Our findings indicate an added value of implicit power motive measures in the organizational leadership field, both for scientific and practical purposes (e.g., leadership selection). Originality/Value Our study is among rare that compared the two most prominent methods for implicit personality measurement (Sackett et al., 2017) on the same sample of participants.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Psihologija



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
UIP-2013-11-6719 - Implicitna ličnost i radno ponašanje (IPAWB) (Galic, Zvonimir, HRZZ - 2013-11) ( CroRIS)
IP-2018-01-9354 - Implicitna ličnost, donošenje odluka i vođenje u organizacijama (IMPEDEMOL) (Galic, Zvonimir, HRZZ - 2018-01) ( CroRIS)

Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb,
Visoko učilište Algebra, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Nataša Trojak (autor)

Avatar Url Zvonimir Galić (autor)

Avatar Url Mitja Ružojčić (autor)


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Galić, Zvonimir; Trojak, Nataša; Ružojčić, Mitja
A comparison of two paradigms for implicit power motive measurement in predicting organizational leadership criteria // 19th EAWOP Congress Abstract Book
Torino, Italija, 2019. str. 171-171 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
Galić, Z., Trojak, N. & Ružojčić, M. (2019) A comparison of two paradigms for implicit power motive measurement in predicting organizational leadership criteria. U: 19th EAWOP Congress Abstract Book.
@article{article, author = {Gali\'{c}, Zvonimir and Trojak, Nata\v{s}a and Ru\v{z}oj\v{c}i\'{c}, Mitja}, year = {2019}, pages = {171-171}, keywords = {Power motive, Conditional Reasoning Test, Implicit Association Test, leadership}, title = {A comparison of two paradigms for implicit power motive measurement in predicting organizational leadership criteria}, keyword = {Power motive, Conditional Reasoning Test, Implicit Association Test, leadership}, publisherplace = {Torino, Italija} }
@article{article, author = {Gali\'{c}, Zvonimir and Trojak, Nata\v{s}a and Ru\v{z}oj\v{c}i\'{c}, Mitja}, year = {2019}, pages = {171-171}, keywords = {Power motive, Conditional Reasoning Test, Implicit Association Test, leadership}, title = {A comparison of two paradigms for implicit power motive measurement in predicting organizational leadership criteria}, keyword = {Power motive, Conditional Reasoning Test, Implicit Association Test, leadership}, publisherplace = {Torino, Italija} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font