Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1116235
A comparison of two paradigms for implicit power motive measurement in predicting organizational leadership criteria
A comparison of two paradigms for implicit power motive measurement in predicting organizational leadership criteria // 19th EAWOP Congress Abstract Book
Torino, Italija, 2019. str. 171-171 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1116235 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
A comparison of two paradigms for implicit
power
motive measurement in predicting organizational
leadership criteria
Autori
Galić, Zvonimir ; Trojak, Nataša ; Ružojčić, Mitja
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
19th EAWOP Congress Abstract Book
/ - , 2019, 171-171
Skup
19th EAWOP congress
Mjesto i datum
Torino, Italija, 29.05.2019. - 01.06.2019
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
Power motive ; Conditional Reasoning Test ; Implicit Association Test ; leadership
Sažetak
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the validity of the Conditional Reasoning Test for Power motive (CRT-P), and an implicit power motive test based on the Implicit Association Test paradigm (IAT-P) in explaining organizational leadership criteria. Design/Methodology/Approach/Intervention. We conducted a study on a sample of Croatian managers of small businesses (N = 66) and their subordinates (N = 194). Managers’ implicit power motive was captured with the CRT-P and IAT-P, and their explicit power motive was assessed with a self-report questionnaire. We also collected managers’ self-reports and subordinates’ reports about the managers’ 172 effectiveness (ME). Also, subordinates self- reported about perceived organizational support (POS), and their task performance (TP) and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs). Results Multi-level analyses showed that CRT-P scores correlated positively with subordinates’ ME ratings and POS, and negatively with subordinates’ CWBs. At the same time, IAT-P scores were significantly related only to ME self-ratings. All relations held when self- reported power motive was controlled for. Limitations Both studies were conducted on a relatively small sample of managers, and the effects were generally small in size. Research/Practical Implications Our findings indicate an added value of implicit power motive measures in the organizational leadership field, both for scientific and practical purposes (e.g., leadership selection). Originality/Value Our study is among rare that compared the two most prominent methods for implicit personality measurement (Sackett et al., 2017) on the same sample of participants.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Psihologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
UIP-2013-11-6719 - Implicitna ličnost i radno ponašanje (IPAWB) (Galic, Zvonimir, HRZZ - 2013-11) ( CroRIS)
IP-2018-01-9354 - Implicitna ličnost, donošenje odluka i vođenje u organizacijama (IMPEDEMOL) (Galic, Zvonimir, HRZZ - 2018-01) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb,
Visoko učilište Algebra, Zagreb