Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1110687
Reliability and Validity of Scales for Assessing Child Dental Fear and Anxiety
Reliability and Validity of Scales for Assessing Child Dental Fear and Anxiety // Acta stomatologica Croatica, 54 (2020), 1; 22-31 doi:10.15644/asc54/1/3 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1110687 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Reliability and Validity of Scales for Assessing
Child Dental Fear and Anxiety
Autori
Leko, Jasna ; Škrinjarić, Tomislav ; Goršeta, Kristina
Izvornik
Acta stomatologica Croatica (0001-7019) 54
(2020), 1;
22-31
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Child ; Dental Anxiety ; Fear ; Patient Health Questionnaire ; Validation Study
(Child ; Dental Anxiety ; Fear ; Patient Health Questionnaire ; Validation Study.)
Sažetak
Objectives: The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of two scales for the assessment of child dental fear and anxiety in a sample of Croatian children. Material and methods: The sample comprised 202 pairs consisting of children and their mothers (97 boys and 105 girls) aged 5 - 12 years. Two scales were used to assess children's DFA: the Children's Fear Survey Schedule - Dental Subscale (CFSS-DS) and the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale - face version (MCDAS-f). The Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale (CDAS) was used in the sample of children's mothers. The average scores of cooperative children and children with behavior management problem (BMP) were compared. Results: Cooperative children displayed significantly lower CFSS-DS scores than children with BMP (M = 28. 46 vs. M = 39. 36 ; P < 0.001). The average MCDAS-f score was significantly higher in children with BMP than in cooperative children (M = 28. 07 vs. 20. 01 ; P < 0.001). The CFSS-DS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0. 90), while internal consistency of MCDAS-f was good (α = 0. 73). The maternal CDAS showed good internal consistency (α = 0, 89). The correlations with other self-report measurements of DFS show good validity of all scales. The correlations between CFSS-DS and MCDAS-f were highly significant (r = 0.482 ; P < 0. 01) as well as the correlations of CFSS-DS and MCDAS-f with CDAS scores (r = 0.223 ; P < 0. 01 and r = 0.198 ; P < 0. 01, respectively. Conclusion: The obtained results suggest that both the CFSS-DS scale and the MCDAS-f scale are reliable and valid scales for measuring dental fear and anxiety in children in a sample of Croatian children. The MCDAS-f scale has shown slightly lower internal consistency but it is suitable for use in young children. In addition, the MCDAS-f scale is simple to administer.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Dentalna medicina
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Stomatološki fakultet, Zagreb
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
- Scopus
- MEDLINE