Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1110128
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (Protocol)
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (Protocol) // Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 5 (2020), CD012388, 16 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1110128 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with
computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging,
and positron emission tomography-computed
tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in
people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer
(Protocol)
Autori
Lund, M ; Nadarevic, T ; Bjerre, TA ; Grønbæk, H ; Mortensen, F ; Kragh, Andersen P
Izvornik
Cochrane database of systematic reviews (1469-493X) 5
(2020);
CD012388, 16
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
colorectal cancer
Sažetak
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (diagnostic). The objectives are as follows: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast- enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) versus contrast- enhanced computed tomography (CECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluro-18- deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. Secondary objectives We plan to investigate the following potential sources of heterogeneity. • Study design (prospective compared to retrospective) • Study date (studies conducted before the year 2000 compared to studies conducted aMer the year 2000) due to advancements in technology and change in diagnostic criteria • Participant selection (participants recruited from planned screening programmes compared to clinical setting) • Proportion of participants with resectable liver metastasis • Maximum diameter of the largest liver lesion • DiNerences in operator skills in CEUS performance, assessed by years of experience • DiNerent reference standards (studies using pathology of resected liver compared to studies using histology of hepatic lesion)
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka,
Klinički bolnički centar Rijeka
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE