Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1099671

Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis


(DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration) Lyubenova, Anita; Neupane, Dipika; Levis, Brooke; Wu, Yin; Sun, Ying; He, Chen; Krishnan, Ankur; Bhandari, Parash M.; Negeri, Zelalem; Imran, Mahrukh et al.
Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis // International journal of methods in psychiatric research, e1860 (2020), e1860, 13 doi:10.1002/mpr.1860 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1099671 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis
(Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis)

Autori
Lyubenova, Anita ; Neupane, Dipika ; Levis, Brooke ; Wu, Yin ; Sun, Ying ; He, Chen ; Krishnan, Ankur ; Bhandari, Parash M. ; Negeri, Zelalem ; Imran, Mahrukh ; Rice, Danielle B. ; Azar, Marleine ; Chiovitti, Matthew J. ; Saadat, Nazanin ; Riehm, Kira E. ; Boruff, Jill T. ; Ioannidis, John P. A. ; Cuijpers, Pim ; Gilbody, Simon ; Kloda, Lorie A. ; Patten, Scott B. ; Shrier, Ian ; Ziegelstein, Roy C. ; Comeau, Liane ; Mitchell, Nicholas D. ; Tonelli, Marcello ; Vigod, Simone N. ; Aceti, Franca ; Barnes, Jacqueline ; Bavle, Amar D. ; Beck, Cheryl T. ; Bindt, Carola ; Boyce, Philip M. ; Bunevicius, Adomas ; Chaudron, Linda H. ; Favez, Nicolas ; Figueiredo, Barbara ; Garcia‐ Esteve, Lluïsa ; Giardinelli, Lisa ; Helle, Nadine ; Howard, Louise M. ; Kohlhoff, Jane ; Kusminskas, Laima ; Kozinszky, Zoltán ; Lelli, Lorenzo ; Leonardou, Angeliki A. ; Meuti, Valentina ; Nakić Radoš, Sandra ; García, Purificación N. ; Pawlby, Susan J. ; Quispel, Chantal ; Robertson‐Blackmore, Emma ; Rochat, Tamsen J. ; Sharp, Deborah J. ; Siu, Bonnie W. M. ; Stein, Alan ; Stewart, Robert C. ; Tadinac, Meri ; Tandon, S. Darius ; Tendais, Iva ; Töreki, Annamária ; Torres‐Giménez, Anna ; Tran, Thach D. ; Trevillion, Kylee ; Turner, Katherine ; Vega‐Dienstmaier, Johann M. ; Benedetti, Andrea ; Thombs, Brett D.

Kolaboracija
DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration

Izvornik
International journal of methods in psychiatric research (1049-8931) E1860 (2020); E1860, 13

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
depression prevalence ; Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale ; structured clinical interview for DSM ; individual participant data meta‐analysis ; major depression

Sažetak
Objectives: Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studies. Methods: We analyzed datasets that compared EPDS scores to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression status. Random‐effects meta‐ analysis was used to compare prevalence with EPDS cutoffs versus the SCID. Results: Seven thousand three hundred and fifteen participants (1017 SCID major depression) from 29 primary studies were included. For EPDS cutoffs used to estimate prevalence in recent studies (≥9 to ≥14), pooled prevalence estimates ranged from 27.8% (95% CI: 22.0%–34.5%) for EPDS ≥ 9 to 9.0% (95% CI: 6.8%–11.9%) for EPDS ≥ 14 ; pooled SCID major depression prevalence was 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%–12.3%). EPDS ≥14 provided pooled prevalence closest to SCID‐based prevalence but differed from SCID prevalence in individual studies by a mean absolute difference of 5.1% (95% prediction interval: 13.7%, 12.3%). Conclusion: EPDS ≥14 approximated SCID‐based prevalence overall, but considerable heterogeneity in individual studies is a barrier to using it for prevalence estimation.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Psihologija



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
MZOS-134-0000000-2421 - Postpartalna depresija – čimbenici rizika, rano otkrivanje i terapijski pristup (Herman, Radoslav, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)

Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb,
Hrvatsko katoličko sveučilište, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Sandra Nakić Radoš (autor)

Avatar Url Meri Tadinac (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

(DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration) Lyubenova, Anita; Neupane, Dipika; Levis, Brooke; Wu, Yin; Sun, Ying; He, Chen; Krishnan, Ankur; Bhandari, Parash M.; Negeri, Zelalem; Imran, Mahrukh et al.
Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis // International journal of methods in psychiatric research, e1860 (2020), e1860, 13 doi:10.1002/mpr.1860 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
(DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration) (DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration) Lyubenova, A., Neupane, D., Levis, B., Wu, Y., Sun, Y., He, C., Krishnan, A., Bhandari, P., Negeri, Z. & Imran, M. (2020) Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis. International journal of methods in psychiatric research, e1860, e1860, 13 doi:10.1002/mpr.1860.
@article{article, author = {Lyubenova, Anita and Neupane, Dipika and Levis, Brooke and Wu, Yin and Sun, Ying and He, Chen and Krishnan, Ankur and Bhandari, Parash M. and Negeri, Zelalem and Imran, Mahrukh and Rice, Danielle B. and Azar, Marleine and Chiovitti, Matthew J. and Saadat, Nazanin and Riehm, Kira E. and Boruff, Jill T. and Ioannidis, John P. A. and Cuijpers, Pim and Gilbody, Simon and Kloda, Lorie A. and Patten, Scott B. and Shrier, Ian and Ziegelstein, Roy C. and Comeau, Liane and Mitchell, Nicholas D. and Tonelli, Marcello and Vigod, Simone N. and Aceti, Franca and Barnes, Jacqueline and Bavle, Amar D. and Beck, Cheryl T. and Bindt, Carola and Boyce, Philip M. and Bunevicius, Adomas and Chaudron, Linda H. and Favez, Nicolas and Figueiredo, Barbara and Garcia‐ Esteve, Llu\"{\i}sa and Giardinelli, Lisa and Helle, Nadine and Howard, Louise M. and Kohlhoff, Jane and Kusminskas, Laima and Kozinszky, Zolt\'{a}n and Lelli, Lorenzo and Leonardou, Angeliki A. and Meuti, Valentina and Naki\'{c} Rado\v{s}, Sandra and Garc\'{\i}a, Purificaci\'{o}n N. and Pawlby, Susan J. and Quispel, Chantal and Robertson‐Blackmore, Emma and Rochat, Tamsen J. and Sharp, Deborah J. and Siu, Bonnie W. M. and Stein, Alan and Stewart, Robert C. and Tadinac, Meri and Tandon, S. Darius and Tendais, Iva and T\"{o}reki, Annam\'{a}ria and Torres‐Gim\'{e}nez, Anna and Tran, Thach D. and Trevillion, Kylee and Turner, Katherine and Vega‐Dienstmaier, Johann M. and Benedetti, Andrea and Thombs, Brett D.}, year = {2020}, pages = {13}, DOI = {10.1002/mpr.1860}, chapter = {e1860}, keywords = {depression prevalence, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, structured clinical interview for DSM, individual participant data meta‐analysis, major depression}, journal = {International journal of methods in psychiatric research}, doi = {10.1002/mpr.1860}, volume = {e1860}, issn = {1049-8931}, title = {Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis}, keyword = {depression prevalence, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, structured clinical interview for DSM, individual participant data meta‐analysis, major depression}, chapternumber = {e1860} }
@article{article, author = {Lyubenova, Anita and Neupane, Dipika and Levis, Brooke and Wu, Yin and Sun, Ying and He, Chen and Krishnan, Ankur and Bhandari, Parash M. and Negeri, Zelalem and Imran, Mahrukh and Rice, Danielle B. and Azar, Marleine and Chiovitti, Matthew J. and Saadat, Nazanin and Riehm, Kira E. and Boruff, Jill T. and Ioannidis, John P. A. and Cuijpers, Pim and Gilbody, Simon and Kloda, Lorie A. and Patten, Scott B. and Shrier, Ian and Ziegelstein, Roy C. and Comeau, Liane and Mitchell, Nicholas D. and Tonelli, Marcello and Vigod, Simone N. and Aceti, Franca and Barnes, Jacqueline and Bavle, Amar D. and Beck, Cheryl T. and Bindt, Carola and Boyce, Philip M. and Bunevicius, Adomas and Chaudron, Linda H. and Favez, Nicolas and Figueiredo, Barbara and Garcia‐ Esteve, Llu\"{\i}sa and Giardinelli, Lisa and Helle, Nadine and Howard, Louise M. and Kohlhoff, Jane and Kusminskas, Laima and Kozinszky, Zolt\'{a}n and Lelli, Lorenzo and Leonardou, Angeliki A. and Meuti, Valentina and Naki\'{c} Rado\v{s}, Sandra and Garc\'{\i}a, Purificaci\'{o}n N. and Pawlby, Susan J. and Quispel, Chantal and Robertson‐Blackmore, Emma and Rochat, Tamsen J. and Sharp, Deborah J. and Siu, Bonnie W. M. and Stein, Alan and Stewart, Robert C. and Tadinac, Meri and Tandon, S. Darius and Tendais, Iva and T\"{o}reki, Annam\'{a}ria and Torres‐Gim\'{e}nez, Anna and Tran, Thach D. and Trevillion, Kylee and Turner, Katherine and Vega‐Dienstmaier, Johann M. and Benedetti, Andrea and Thombs, Brett D.}, year = {2020}, pages = {13}, DOI = {10.1002/mpr.1860}, chapter = {e1860}, keywords = {depression prevalence, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, structured clinical interview for DSM, individual participant data meta‐analysis, major depression}, journal = {International journal of methods in psychiatric research}, doi = {10.1002/mpr.1860}, volume = {e1860}, issn = {1049-8931}, title = {Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis}, keyword = {depression prevalence, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, structured clinical interview for DSM, individual participant data meta‐analysis, major depression}, chapternumber = {e1860} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font