Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1091247
Analytical Validation of Atellica COAG 360 System
Analytical Validation of Atellica COAG 360 System // Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis / Cushman, Mary (ur.).
Melbourne, Australija: John Wiley & Sons, 2019. str. 119-119 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, stručni)
CROSBI ID: 1091247 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Analytical Validation of Atellica
COAG 360 System
Autori
Lapić, Ivana ; Doželenčić, Monika ; Coen Herak, Desiree ; Miloš, Marija ; Zadro, Renata
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, stručni
Izvornik
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
/ Cushman, Mary - : John Wiley & Sons, 2019, 119-119
Skup
27th Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Mjesto i datum
Melbourne, Australija, 06.07.2019. - 10.07.2019
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
haemostasis, global coagulation tests, validation study, Atellica COAG360
Sažetak
Background : Replacement of instrumentation and/or reagents in a coagulation laboratory requires validation of a new system. Aims : The aim was to perform the analytical validation of Atellica COAG 360 (Siemens Healthineers, Germany) for prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen, antithrombin (AT), anti- Xa activity, protein C (PC) activity and lupus anticoagulant screening test (LA1). Methods : Validation was performed according to the CLSI EP15- A2 protocol. Within- run and between- run precision were assessed in the normal and pathological range for five consecutive days in triplicate using: Control plasma N, Control plasma P, Dade Ci- Trol 2, Heparin LMW Control 1/Control 2, and LA Control 1/Control 2. Accuracy was calculated from between- run precision data. Measurement uncertainty (MU) was estimated by 10 replicate measurements of Standard Human Plasma. Method comparison with the routinely used analyzer BCS XP (Siemens Healthineers, Germany) included analysis of routine plasma samples covering a wide analytical range. Results : The highest within- run and between- run CVs were 1.7% and 1.4% (PT), 1.3% and 1.1% (INR), 0.5% and 0.5% (aPTT), 1.4% and 2.1% (fibrinogen), 2.0% and 2.6% (AT), 1.6% and 2.6% (anti- Xa), 2.1% and 1.7% (PC), 1.5% and 2.5% (LA1), and all met the Westgard and/ or manufacturer´s acceptance criteria, where applicable. The highest bias and MU were obtained for PT, - 11.3% and 19.9%, respectively. Spearman´s rank correlation coefficients were ≥0.97, except for PC (0.89). Passing- Bablok regression analysis showed constant and proportional difference for aPTT [y=- 4.43(- 5.18 to - 3.64)+1.0(0.99- 1.01) x], fibrinogen [y=- 0.52(- 0.75 to - 0.32)+1.16(1.10- 1.22)x] and INR [y=0.03(0.01- 0.05)+0.95(0.93- 0.97)x], constant difference for PT [y=0.02(0.02- 0.03)+1.0(0.99- 1.01)x] and proportional difference for AT [y=0.31(- 6.76 to 5.32)+0.92(0.86- 0.99)x]. Conclusions : Minor discrepancies to the previously used system were observed. Overall, Atellica Coag 360 showed satisfactory analytical performance and can be implemented into routine practice.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
POVEZANOST RADA