Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1090141
Constitutional Reforms of Citizen-Initiated Referendum: Causes of Different Outcomes in Slovenia and Croatia
Constitutional Reforms of Citizen-Initiated Referendum: Causes of Different Outcomes in Slovenia and Croatia // Revus, Journal for Constitutional Theory and philosophy of Law, 26 (2015), 26; 129-149 doi:10.4000/revus.3337 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1090141 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Constitutional Reforms of Citizen-Initiated
Referendum: Causes of Different Outcomes in
Slovenia and Croatia
Autori
Podolnjak, Robert
Izvornik
Revus, Journal for Constitutional Theory and philosophy of Law (1581-7652) 26
(2015), 26;
129-149
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Citizen-initiated referendum, popular initiative, constitutional reform, Slovenia, Croatia
Sažetak
In the opinion of many Slovenian and Croatian scholars, the constitutional and legislative design of citizen-initiated referendums in their respective countries was in many ways flawed. Referendums initiated by citizens have caused, at least from the point of view of governments in these two countries, many unexpected constitutional, political and/or economic problems. Over the years, several unsuccessful constitutional reforms of the institute of referendum have been attempted both in Slovenia and Croatia. In 2013, Slovenia finally attained its ‘constitutional moment’ in which it was possible to reach an almost universal consensus in the National Assembly on constitutionally redesigning the legislative referendum. On the other hand, several attempts by the Croatian Parliament to amend the constitutional provision relating to citizens’ initiatives have come to nothing due to the interests of the major parties in the constitutional amendment process being different.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Scopus
- HeinOnline