ࡱ> O bjbjȽ4&ߢeߢe})\ \ 8\W,;----:BV ,,,,,,,.1R,bbb,--,V"V"V"b~--,V"b,V"V":&,P'-,r& , -0;-&R1n 1P'P'1'bbV"bbbbb,,b!bbb;-bbbb1bbbbbbbbb\  u: GLOBALISTS DEFENCE AMBITIONS AGAINST SOVEREIGNTISTS OPPORTUNISM IN EUROPE Bostjan Peternelj University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences, Slovenia, doctoral candidate  HYPERLINK "mailto:peternelj.bostjan@gmail.com" peternelj.bostjan@gmail.com Petar Kurecic University North, Department of Economics, Varazdin, Ulica 104. brigade 3, Croatia  HYPERLINK "mailto:petar.kurecic@unin.hr" petar.kurecic@unin.hr ABSTRACT This paper represents a product of doctoral student and mentor cooperation. In the paper, a globalist versus sovereigntist perspective regarding the building of European defence forces is analysed. Namely, globalists believe that the defence cooperation between individuals, institutions and corporations would ensure that the potential fruits of globalization would be spread throughout the world, fairly, safety, and equally. Economic globalism aims towards the exchange of goods, services, and capital that accompanied the market exchange with international defence complex between the EU and NATO, which produced, purchased, and acquired the most advanced defence capabilities. On the contrary, sovereigntists pushed many times in history the world toward an edge of destruction but globalists had intervened rapidly by preventing sovereign plots those were orchestrated at entities from military globalism as product of sovereign alliances or military treaties in the neorealist international system. We show the importance of the crucial tension between globalism and sovereignism on the example of the European defence. Neoliberal globalist system is more stable and interconnected for peace to prevent any escalations between sovereign states. It should not be forgotten that European globalists had tried to join the feudal and modern European states by joining them into the European community toward the United States of Europe about 200 years ago but this attempt had failed. The research was conducted by using the content analysis of the relevant sources, methods of comparation, deduction, and synthesis. Regional franchise of globalists tried to resume the implementation of idea of the common army that was postponed or delayed in the period since the Pleven Plan was refused. However, the ambitions expressed in the Plan are again actual in Brussels. Keywords: globalists, sovereigntists, defence, the European Union (the EU); NATO, Pleven Plan. INTRODUCTION The paper represents a product of doctoral student and mentor cooperation. In the paper, globalist versus sovereigntist perspective regarding the building of European defence forces is analysed. Globalists had planned to create a new geopolitical paradigm a similar to the ancient socialism theory. Sovereigntists stroke on transatlantic corporation NATO model as set of tools from US globalists to control the EU political society. Radical leftists movements supported from globalists financial adoptions could drag in sovereigntists into a delicate situation if interstate political situation in the EU states rapidly deteriorated as blow up of final back up scenario at the US globalist strategy after dissolving NATO may downfall the EU too. We put the thesis that globalists are looking to launch updated plan for Europe by inserting new social-political movement how to destroy or eliminate long lasting political power of conservative circles in EU states to fight back against sovereigntists who reclaimed to return back to national security and national interests. Sovereigntists often used reprisals for security measures to beat back radical movements by protecting interstate security. Sovereigntists are (un)ready for direct struggle with US globalists which had created neoliberal financial-economic regime in the transatlantic relationship (NATO). Sovereigntists plans included security protection how to eliminate or avoid globalists crises after the imposed economic shocks, trade sanctions, epidemic diseases etc. against sovereign states. Its major goal preserved protectionism by staying intact from globalist sanctions against national protectionism. Regionalist states as European integralists players played pivotal role for more defence in Europe. The EU franchise of globalists presented an option between globalists and sovereigntists struggles into transatlantic ties. Empirical methods were used here on how to analyse contradictory aspects between globalists (regionalists) and sovereign states on power of nations after Brexit within interconnected and indivisible world system at its (political) defence and military ambitions. NEW GLOBALISTS VERSUS SOVEREIGNTISTS EU PARADIGM AND THE TRANSATLANTIC TIES Sovereigntists are using norms and rather accepted values, such as constitution, freedom rights, democracy and rule of law. COVID-19 in Europe had shown that they need financial assistance from globalists who have financial, economic, security etc. power over states to finally socked out sovereigntists from colossal trouble. Sovereigntists adopted a realistic theory that is strongly opposed to European integration process as encountered to integrationists theory of supranational statehood. Globalists adopted liberal ideas among trans geopolitical, geo-economical, geo-energetic etc. streams inside interconnected world, continents and regions by protagonists, meant regional power states. Two different ideologies entrenched into opposite ditched lines like in wargames scenarios, blue and red coloured players are struggled each other during battle drill exercising on the historical case study NATO against the Warsaw Treaty before 1991. If we compare EU in case study under pretext the EU house in better world presented globalists instruments to find solutions for each EU member states that was succumbed with social-economic problems. Financial or security adoptions played critical role how to find the light at end of tunnels for the entrapped sovereigntists into critical circumstance dedicated to case of corona pandemics as evident example for crises management urgency from European commission uncapable to react at right time. Nationalist and populist parties are thrown into the same basket what they promised to own nations under cunning pretention as faulty messiahs in the state authority those try to rescue own nation from globalists regime clasps. Their intention is at most financial for their own property abuse try to return national currency in payment policy, uncontrolled printing money could deteriorate financial regulations by increasing public debt that throws national currency from hyperinflation to bankruptcy. Partial properties at sovereign parties among national currency possession that run toward personal plunder of national treasury does not difficult from criminal gang machinations. They would drive within similar paths as private bankers who are intended by financing its political interests those are intertwined with national economic plunder. Aggressive sovereigntist attacks on globalists could endanger international monetary, economic and defence order that may crash and fell into global anarchy, possible to increase international disorder that pushed the critical situation of disorder into interstate and intrastate wars without regional control. Globalist thoughts oppose closing national borders by lifting tariffs for foreign goods and recover border controls before Schengen regime in the EU. Multinational or transnational companies had opened free global market and loaned money by giving lowest rates of interests. Sovereigntists claimed back to national currency by giving shark loan interests to national consumers that may choke cashflows to then and take into opposite financial results at achieved prosperity into national economy development. If we fenced market and invent autarky economic systems in the state by sovereigntists, skyrocketed shortage in public goods and services and imported merchants was blocked, people stayed in column in front of doors empty or plundered mega markets or stores after catering of merchants deliver ceased to work through international logistics. Negative effects stand up in national defence requirements by purchasing defence capabilities from foreign producers (outsources), servicing and fixing those defence capabilities those were bought from international coalition states. What would happen if the EU defence market collapsed from small EU states those did not build up defence factories for the purpose of consummation in ammo, car parts and spearheads from foreign defence factories. National defence system collapsed if did not reactivate defend of state. More luckily are big states those had developed national defence complex for purchasing, servicing and trafficking defence merchants, and are absolutely independent from outside sourcing, in opposite small states without own defence merchant complex are too week and wounded from interventions to defend our self. Globalist regime presented solution to achieve peace and harmony between states under international order that regulated standard of living for states into global coalition. Regional centres of power on global level into multipolar world build up public transnational regimes that control aggressive states among them, getting balance military powers among regional superpowers and regulate arms control regime into defence regulations as to supervise, check and balance security at global level through confederation council and technocrat bodies those control security regulations accepted by a confederation council as supreme council. Globalists failures were evident to stop sovereign states by resume aggressions or hostilities into international security system that did not work as was expected from affiliated nations in the world. Liberal EU globalists had followed the political idea that was forgotten after NATO was formed to constitute federalist implementation plan of the United States of Europe that included all European nations into a single state under international government. European citizens are protected individual-social rights under constitution of EU and administrative borders of sovereign are blurred. Globalists supported a humanitarian doctrine known as the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Doctrine that was passed in the United Nations (2005). This doctrine promoted human solidarity in the face of the militarization of public life. Sovereigntists had been taken responsibility to protect their populations from mass violence and gives the international community the right to intervene through economic, coercive, and, as a final resort, military measures. This new articulation of sovereignty as membership in the international community saw a symbolic shift in discourses that articulated responsibilities to a global community as characteristic of a new era of moral and humanitarian protectionism (Thomas and Clarke, 2013: 317). Humanitarian intervention is possible to react against sovereign oppressions and suppressions on own citizens, but that the European Defence Union (EDU) has not stipulated mechanism how to intervene inside community by violating federal constitution, international agreements, protocols etc. Solidarity clause of the EDU does not match violation of human rights or humanity with the V. Article of the Brussels agreement, as long federal state of the EU will be not constituted, so long the appropriated institutions of the EU are unable to react. On the contrary, the EU-Neoconservative globalists supported protracted NATO-centric theory in Europe. They are aware that dissolution of NATO brings to the end of the transatlantic collective defence and nuclear deterrence under the US nuclear umbrella disappeared from Europe. The EU states with anti-Russian sentiments are scared that European NATO pillar states need to provide its own security without the US deterrence toward Russia. This is a major political blow for the so-called free rider states under the US defence protectionism those are supported the US hegemonism in Europe under pretext that transgression on national security from Russia would preserve NATO so long as needed to defend border states at red line of the Russian protective bastion line A2AD. Key points of anti-Russian conservative circles is turned around defence costs, sustained capabilities and protectionism under alliance. Those key points did not match within European defence that does not include European nuclear deterrent, while is not important to follow nuclear escalation against Russia. In other words, the disappearance of NATO would call for a further deepening of European integration with the Russian cooperation inside converging Eurasian mainland to control the world mainland. Neoconservative circles neglected and opposed to deepening integration defence plan of neoliberal globalists. In opposite, the demise of NATO would dramatically increase Russia's position toward EU but does not mean that Russia shall exploit the EUs weakness for intimidation its European neighbours in grow up tensions with Baltic states. Consequently, the dissolution of NATO would translate into relatively small savings for the USA, if would lose allies and military bases in Europe. In sum, a world without NATO would be a bad deal for the USA and for some partners in Europe (Ruhle, 2019). Europe without NATO brought to the end of the collective defence in transatlantic ties, what in opposite direction will absolutely increase Russian power after revisionism of EU Russian relations. European community will be put under Russian nuclear umbrella after the US withdrawal all military (nuclear shortrange) capabilities from harboured US bases and barracks in Europe. France after the UKs withdrawal from the EDU may play marginal role to protect the EU states with own nuclear umbrella. Interoperability into transatlantic ties will disappear from NATOs demise after increased defence integration of the EU states toward more sustained European sovereignty. The UK had sealed a fate that NATO-centric pole in Europe is melting like snow under the EU-centric integration of defence capabilities and priorities at the EDU toward common army and harmonization of the European defence complex. A bad deal for the US interests in Europe may run the EU integration and harmonization process to stronger regional defence cooperation as melting pot under Eurasian geopolitics. The United Kingdom is out of game on continent by pressing NATO-centric states to postpone or delay European defence and military ambitions. Pleven plan was a part of the UK game of despair for stopping regional EU globalists ambitions. The EU federalists presented a part of globalists groups in Europe and strongly opposed to sovereign ideology which tried to undermine the European integration process that had been stop afterwards European solidarity was loosed, then were affected by political and security disunity toward integration process for the Western Balkans states, diplomatic dissipation in effective struggle against migration crisis, terrorism and corona virus those had flooded geostrategic states inside European community. The UK was blamed for past political mistakes of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) that intentionally derogate common defence decisions with the main reason to keep annoying France on continent not to carry out federalist plans for European community. Federation like integration of EU militaries was a red line to the UK despite it vetoed to establish military HQ in Brussels. EU REGIONALISTS (FEDERALIST) AMBITIONS TOWARD MORE INDEPENDENT EUROPE French President Macron had asserted publicly into public that NATO is brain dead. He vindicated that NATO commitment in Article 5 on the collective NATO self-defence dragged France into a global nuclear war against Russia (Lantier, 2019). The French President had stressed into the public opinion seriously that the EU ought to rebuild European strategic autonomy and reconsider position towards Russia. Political frictions between European NATO states and the USA had been transmitted from security matters to economic struggles, that overhauled defence markets against the US leading capitalist states in the Europe to purchase the US defence products at the shelf. Europe feared that behind failed defence markets is covered the US financial collapse that may drag Europe downturn into financial abyss as to increase public debts. Why European NATO states shall invest our savings to buy the US debt. Trade war between Europe and the US purred oil on arson after suspended oil trade market for West capitalistic states momentary collapsed. What is actually behind this then? Neoliberal globalists plans included dissolving NATO and transforming them as the only part what Europe was before, it meant that the European NATO pillar shall be converted into EU army and resumed defence cooperation with Russia. The US army pulled out own troops from European NATO pillar in Europe within deported nukes from Germany, Italy and the Benelux states. Other US army strategic infrastructure from fortressed Europe those cannot be removed entirely is the case of negation as to pay off for the accommodation domain the EU army troops into released the US bases across Europe. European states shall take care our self for defence and paid for it as fare share, no more free riders states on the pledges of the US taxpayers. In opposite, Neocon globalists plan that followed neorealist ideology, pushed intentionally the European NATO pillar further toward escalation with Russia during enlargement process on other states to join the transatlantic alliance. NATO troops approached to doorstep tried to enter in the former Soviet Union space. Well, the USA formed commanding group for European theatre of war that sketched out a master plan to attack Russia from Ukraine, is leading war operations from behind by pushing European army boots on the floor directly into confrontation. Pentagon paid campaign through NATOs budget to conduct war with Russia where was a plan to drag the EU-NATO states into devastated war with an outcome to kill two flies in one swing in mutual destruction of the two communities, especially planed the end for the EU defence community and totally destructed the Eurasian space from used at most advanced conventional and nuclear capabilities those were used from the US and Russia. The EU NATO troops at first frontline played the crucial role of cannon fodder, this were seen before by the fifth column in the Syrian case. The Cold War hysteria beyond 75 years of ideological confrontation finally came to the end of hostilities. Strategic goal accomplished from Pentagon players by hiding in bunkers deepened into ground and survived from nuclear strikes. Reporting Europe in ashes is documented by players into post war review. NATO faces significant massive imbalance as disbursed military capabilities in quantity suffered no operative setbacks for European NATO pillar and Europe shall take care itself after the US President Trump had asserted that NATO became an outdated organization that needs to invest more money to become more autonomous for its own defence. Trump is wavering to the EU-NATO states that after departure of the USA from Europe they will pay more money for defence and European nuclear deterrent is not seen in sight. If we compare defence spending than we figured out that US spends nearly 4% of the GDP on the military; for NATO Europe, the figure is barely 1.6% of the GDP. That disparate economic burden is only one reason why we need to conduct a comprehensive review of whether the NATO commitment serves Americas interests any longer, but it is an important one (Carpenter, 2016). European pillar NATO states spent twice less for defence like the USA and disproportionate defence spending inside alliance drove NATO on the stake. Which costs were included into burden sharing for common defence? We supposed that here are included the US nuclear deterrence spending as guaranty for Europe that needs a big sum of money. Europe, if being unprotected without NATO protective (nuclear) umbrella after reset post-American balance of power in Eurasia (EU Bulletin, 2018) would be strategic disaster, while some EU states will seek their own deals with Moscow for bargain chip as to remain safety under Russias sphere of influence. The US sphere of interests in Eurasia will be diminished, that is the point of debacle in the US foreign policy toward Europe. Eurasian regionalization puts out of control the US dominance. The EU may feel unpleasant if it going to be tailored the EU states by supporting or not supporting Russian part of integration into broaden the Euro-Asian community. Globalists ambitions are part of the old geopolitics game as to re-join world island in one centre of world power under thesis, who controlled world centre than it will control the entire world. That is the main point into gravitation where regional globalists are focused after NATOs demise. THE USA IS PRESERVING NATOS HEGEMONY IN EUROPE Four essential proposals were shifted to the North Atlantic Council (NAC) into discussion. First, NATO should close its doors to new members. Second, the NAC would include a suspension or expulsion clause within NATOs founding document to hold member states to their promises. Third, systemic unaccountability, free-riding, and business-as-usual does no favours to NATO and is unfair to the US service members who would bear the brunt of any NATO military engagement and the US taxpayers who would fund it. Fourth, Washington should also encourage Europes attempts to become more autonomous in its own defence (The Federalist, 2019).Two-sided EUUS political conditions had complicated further restructuring NATO plans in the third batch-decade of reforms as coded NATO 2030: (1) No further NATO enlargement toward East is acceptable by trespassing Russian red line while Russian army is able to strike back hard by activating A2AD shield in Ukraine and Kaliningrad region; (2) The US cannot keep promises for guaranty in European deterrence policy under the Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty, to repel any Russian conventional or unconventional frontal attack at frontal axis from Kaliningrad-Belorussian and Ukraine gateways to NATO protected territory; (3) The USA will not tolerate freeriding states in NATO by hiding behind the US taxpayers wallets; (4) After previous three points followed the Trump effect that pushed European NATO states toward more autonomous decision making as to selfcare for European security and paid more money for European part of defence as a fair share for European part of NATO burden sharing. Binnendijk (2019) had argued a path to NATO downturn in five consequences what happened if the USA pulled its own troops out of Europe, what implications may sustain at geopolitical and geo-economical damage to the US economy under hegemonistic pretext. European community after BREXIT due could be disbanded beneath NATO too if was pushed into disorder then the EU will be less safety and less interconnected European nations like before. The USA had always played on the trump card if the USA may leave Europe than the EU states will restore wartime by setting up ancient war coalitions and anti-coalitions grouped around two antagonistic poles France and Germany on the continent to confront each other like savages. Balkan states are the best example to compare them with bloody wars in Europe but those were ended by the US intervention. The UK went back to splendid isolation in geo-policy like before and it still wating behind corner cowardly what is happening during wartime period on the continent. China presented next target as mayor transgression to the US interests in the world if neoliberal model is endangered from Chinas aggressive anti-US sentiment in Asia uprising into world power: NATOs retirement or demise would drastically decrease American political influence in Europe. American bases in Europe those provided the US army forces under the USEUCOM into war thorn region were never so closely in Europe to Russian border after the end of the World War II. The US geopolitical interest are hiding behind NATO and excuses the situation for the unlimited access of the USA, by entrenching them into ditches at eastern flank. NATOs retirement would exacerbate security division within Europe as teared apart on old Europe and new Europe hubs. European NATO states were put in poor military conditions at most being un operative to fight without modern military forces and capabilities. All European defence forces were never submitted into disastrous situation when they had joint under NATO most unprepared and unorganized. They had invested less money for army modernization under the US security umbrella. However, the USA doing the heavy lifting the resulted in the dismantling of the European militaries after the Second World War (Szilvai, 2017). NATOs retirement would have drastic consequences for security at global aspects. American bilateral alliances in Asia would be shifted into defence treaty after the EU-US community was dissolved. If China determined to claim a dominant position in Asia, the collapse of NATO would cause Americas Asian partners to seek defence accommodation against China that redirected anti-Russian sentiment toward Asia. NATOs retirement had forced the US national defence spending by pruning its costs for NATO budget and other administrative costs for paid salaries to military personnel in USEUCOM staff, maintenance costs in the US army bases, bases, barracks etc. in foreign hosts countries and cancelled NATO military battle drill exercises on military polygons entire Europe. The US Army prepared tenders to sell of military properties on territory where the US forces were hosted in military immobilises. Other mobilities of the US military capabilities and nuclear weapons were moved out of Europe until deadline. NATOs retirement could have negative implications on the US economic and financial hegemonic impacts in Europe to be more safety and secured for investment of the US capital under preface of partnership that relied on a solid foundation of common values, including a commitment to the rule of law, the democratic process, free enterprise, respect for human rights, and alleviating poverty (Galik, 2019: 11). The transatlantic partnership for free trade deal by lifting tariffs on imported US merchants to European food market had failed. The USA had imposed economic sanctions after Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP, 2013) was refused from the EU as retaliation measures to European exporters of military capabilities to the US market that affected badly EU defence market. Geo-economic disputes had extended more deeper NATO non-solidarity what had speeded up to oust the US defence producers from the EU defence market, by starting up PESCO projects achieved more autonomy for self-desired supply chains with defence products off the shelf from domain producers. The final impact of NATOs retirement would push down the liberal international order. Neoliberal theories among international order that consists of treaties, alliances, agreements, institutions and modes of behaviour mostly created by the USA, in an effort to safeguard democracies in pretext for world domination under liberal emperor regime. This neoliberal regime had kept relative peace in the trans-Atlantic space for seven decades. Trump is going to implement isolationist theory under moto America first under pretext to return back American sovereignty. The end of NATO would deprive Europeans and the US defence cooperation to the zero level that would exclude an important framework of legitimacy for the abusing military power. The USA cannot rely on European partners or force them for further implementing the US geopolitical interests under pretext of using NATO collective defence clause. The USA cannot impel European partners on the battle ground anymore within any conditions or circumstances of treaty if disappears NATO's common defence planning and exercise practices. Sooner rather than later the USA would lose their ability to cooperate militarily as a military enabler by leading from behind as cover dice military actions that would become far more difficult. Logistical supply was possible from behind as airwing support too, but did not physical expose to danger at contact fire line for the US infantry. Leading from behind military theory presents commodity and safety distance in wartime as to avoid the first cannon fodder line effect at atrocity aspects. All NATO strategies are based on the US safety war theories how to avoid casualties in own troops. CONCLUSION Geo-economic and geopolitical impacts from sovereigntists toward globalists made difficult strains by preserving neoliberal world order after the end of the Cold War, where NATO played a crucial role to postpone its demise. Globalists indication as to vindicate hegemonic grip at the USA to dominate over Europe, impacted on regional franchise of globalists who proclaimed itself as European sovereigntists for more Europe both into defence and military ambitions. Which trump card shall play the EU regionalists into defence integrations is another question on that need to be answered into next years ahead after political, economic etc. turmoil between Europe and the USA into transatlantic ties. If we bet on the traditional EU-US relations under NATO pretext, that had been deteriorating after sanctions against Russia were imposed, we expected that European pillar during long lasting vassal relations in NATO under the US hegemony cannot hold on previous stance and it will collapse soon. The optimal option for the European sovereigntists model on defence and military ambitions was presented into this article. REFERENCES Binnendijk, H. (2019). Five consequences of a life without NATO. Available on  HYPERLINK "https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2019/03/19/5-consequences-of-a-life-without-nato/" https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2019/03/19/5-consequences-of-a-life-without-nato/. Carpenter, G. (2016). Is it time for America to Quit NATO? Available on https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-skeptics/it-time-america-quit-nato-15615. EU bulletin (2018). A World Without NATO: What Would Happen if the Alliance Disbanded? Available on https://www.eubulletin.com/9109-a-world-without-nato-what-would-happen-if-the-alliance-disbanded.html. Galik, Z. (2019). Regional and Bilateral Relations of the European Union. Dialog Campus. Lantier, A. (2019). Macron warns Economist magazine of world war, collapse of NATO alliance. Available on  HYPERLINK "https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/11/09/macr-n09.html" https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/11/09/macr-n09.html. Ruhle, M. (2019) A world without NATO? Available at:  HYPERLINK "https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2018/08/29/a-world-without-nato/index.html" https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2018/08/29/a-world-without-nato/index.html Szilvai, T. (2017). EU Army: The Uphill Struggle for a Capable Defence Policy. Available at: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/50457/szilvai.tamas-EU.studies.minor.thesis.pdf?sequence=2 The Federalist (2019).  HYPERLINK "https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/13/3-major-reforms-nato-needs-to-keep-it-from-collapsing/" \o "3 Major Reforms NATO Needs To Keep From Collapsing" Three Major Reforms NATO Needs To Keep From Collapsing. Available at:  HYPERLINK "https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/13/3-major-reforms-nato-needs-to-keep-it-from-collapsing/" https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/13/3-major-reforms-nato-needs-to-keep-it-from-collapsing/ Thomas, D. (2013). Globalization and Race: Structures of Inequality, New Sovereignties, and Citizenship in a Neoliberal Era. Available at:  HYPERLINK "https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155515" https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155515.     PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT2   35KLMNa䯘~dJ3J-hl6CJOJPJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$3h'h'6CJOJPJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$3h'h'5CJOJPJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$3h'h'CJOJPJQJ\aJmH nHsH tH-h0oCJOJPJQJ\aJmH nHsH tH6h'h0o5CJOJPJQJ\aJmH nHsH tH0haj5CJOJPJQJ\aJmH nHsH tH6h'h'5CJOJPJQJ\aJmH nHsH tH LMNOa    f $d7$8$]a$gdu$dh7$8$a$gd' $da$gd' $da$gd'dx7$8$gd'$dx7$8$a$gd'      赐tZA'3h'h'5CJOJPJQJaJmHnH$sHtH$0h'h'CJOJPJQJaJmHnH$sHtH$3h'h'6CJOJPJQJaJmHnH$sHtH$6h'h'6>*CJOJPJQJaJmHnH$sHtH$Hjh'h'6>*B*CJOJPJQJUaJmH nH$phsH tH$?h'h'6>*B*CJOJPJQJaJmHnH$phsHtH$$h'h'CJOJQJaJmH sH -jh'h'CJOJQJUaJmH sH   2 < > F H ^ f g ðÖwaH2+h'h'5CJOJPJQJaJmH sH 0h'h0oCJOJPJQJaJmH nHsH tH*h'h'6>*CJOJQJaJmH sH <jh'h'6>*B*CJOJQJUaJmH phsH 3h'h'6>*B*CJOJQJaJmH phsH $h'h'CJOJQJaJmH sH -jh'h'CJOJQJUaJmH sH !h'6CJOJQJaJmH sH 'h'h'6CJOJQJaJmH sH    A B Q R V ^ s w     ^ m ԰ԝt^K^K^K^K^K^K^K^K^K^t%huCJOJPJQJ]aJmH sH +h'h0oCJOJPJQJ]aJmH sH +h'hJECJOJPJQJ]aJmH sH %h'CJOJPJQJ]aJmH sH %h'5CJOJPJQJaJmH sH "huCJOJPJQJaJmH sH "h(CJOJPJQJaJmH sH (h'h'CJOJPJQJaJmH sH +h'h0o5CJOJPJQJaJmH sH  q y } &/7ISTmy   *V]įt_(huh0oCJOJPJQJaJmH sH "h'CJOJPJQJaJmH sH %huCJOJPJQJ]aJmH sH +h'hJECJOJPJQJ]aJmH sH (h'h0oCJOJPJQJaJmH sH "huCJOJPJQJaJmH sH %h'CJOJPJQJ]aJmH sH +h'h0oCJOJPJQJ]aJmH sH   )*bcdefҽmU:5h'huCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /hk(BCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH "h0oCJOJPJQJaJmH sH "huW~CJOJPJQJaJmH sH +h'h0o6CJOJPJQJaJmH sH +h'hJE6CJOJPJQJaJmH sH (h'h0oCJOJPJQJaJmH sH +h'h0o5CJOJPJQJaJmH sH .h'h0o56CJOJPJQJaJmH sH  cdeft6E.4DD"EQeZfZgZde-D@&M gd4 $da$gd'dgd'$de-D@&M a$gd'$dx7$8$]a$gdajfst7A^j %èrWr?r?WW?W/huCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hSCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hpj*CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hJECJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5hajhajCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH ;h'hV5CJOJQJ\aJfHmH q sH ;h'h'5CJOJQJ\aJfHmH q sH %&-67@APYoz}ɮɮxxx]5h'h^:ICJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hJECJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hfCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h6CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hF?CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h6SCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH &5ESW]v"*-MN`akɮɓ{````E`E```5h'hbCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hF?CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /huCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h6SCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hJECJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h6CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h)bCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH k  #56:Y\fgxyɓɓxxxɓ]]B]5h'h/QCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h^:ICJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hbCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hJECJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h6CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hyCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hIUCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH y &'ɱɖ{`E`E{E*5h'h/QCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hIUCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hJECJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h^:ICJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /huCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h6CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hF?CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH '-18q䱖{``E5h'h~8CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hJECJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h^:ICJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h/QCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /huCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 3GP[acgwɖ{{{`{E{5h'hIUCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hJECJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /huCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hNaCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h~8CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hK{CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH  '0:;JX_szɮɓxxx`E5h'hx CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /huCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hJECJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hNaCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hIUCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h`TCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH "56?DIȬmWD1D$h'hJECJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hCJOJQJaJmH sH *h'h5CJOJQJ\aJmH sH $haj5CJOJQJ\aJmH sH *h'haj5CJOJQJ\aJmH sH *h'h'5CJOJQJ\aJmH sH 6h'h'5CJOJPJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$6h'hJE5CJOJPJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH  ITpxSVWj}&0=Gͺͧͧp\p\p'h'hJECJOJQJ]aJmH sH 'h'hCJOJQJ]aJmH sH hCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hJECJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hPCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hCJOJQJaJmH sH hk(BCJOJQJaJmH sH hajCJOJQJaJmH sH !4  C#G#S#]#f$o$$$y%%&&(((())*+N-P-y-z---D.E.M.P.Z.ڷڤڑڤڤڑڤځځڷڤځڷnڤ$h'hDqCJOJQJaJmH sH hk(BCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'h)bCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hJECJOJQJaJmH sH hCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'h,J~CJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hACJOJQJaJmH sH *Z.g...........G/I/i/t///////00*03080<0C0F0J0K0Y00022n^^nnnhCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hACJOJQJaJmH sH hF/CJOJQJaJmH sH $h'h0bSCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hJECJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hNCJOJQJaJmH sH hk(BCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'h5CJOJQJaJmH sH $22,3031393:3A3B3L333364>4A4E4r4v4444444444 5 555#5ڴǴǴn[nn$h'hJECJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'h,J~CJOJQJaJmH sH h4CJOJQJaJmH sH haCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hL)CJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hACJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hNCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'h0bSCJOJQJaJmH sH  #525<5>5C5M5Q5a5e5f5p5t5u5{5555555#6$6)6E6I6ǴǴ~cKKcKcKccc/h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'heCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH $h'heCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hACJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'h'CJOJQJaJmH sH I6J6Y6]6n6r6u66666666666 77i7ɮɓx]EE]/hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hACJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hBLCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h4h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'heCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h^<CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH i7o77777.8/8F8g8i8888888899999999̱̖̖̖̖kS/hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /hk(BCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH $h'hCJOJQJaJmH sH 5h'hBLCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h^<CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 9 :/:=:G:I:V:Z:::::;;;;;;;;;</<xx`x`Mx`$h'hCJOJQJaJmH sH /h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h4h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hJECJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hBLCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h'CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /<S<T<Z<^<< =;=?=Z=========>%>f>h>>>>>&?*?k?{{{{`{H{{/h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h4h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h|TCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /hk(BCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hA/CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hACJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h#wCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH k?o?????????l@p@q@~@AACAMAYAaAɱɱ{{c{H{5h'hJECJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /hk(BCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hVCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hA/CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h|TCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hACJOJQJaJfHmH q sH aAAABBBBTCXCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC\DDDD{{{{{{{{`E`5h'hYoCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h-8CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hVCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hACJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /hk(BCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hJECJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH DDDDDDDDDDDD EE!E"Eɮ䛀dKdKd/6h'h855CJOJPJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$0hk(B5CJOJPJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$6h'hk(B5CJOJPJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH $h'hVCJOJQJaJmH sH 5h'hACJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h-8CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hYoCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH "E)E*EEGEPE[EaEbEtEuEzE{EEEEEF矉nSnSn8nSn8n5h'h]CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hACJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h JeCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH *h4CJOJPJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$0h'h4CJOJPJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$0h'h]CJOJPJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$*hk(BCJOJPJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$0h'h JeCJOJPJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$FFF F FFFFFF F(F6FXF]FaFdF䮓{{``E*5h'hFVCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'heCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hiCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h JeCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h]CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h+CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h0CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH dFiFFFFFFFFFFFFF G$G,G6Gɮɮx`G.0h'h LCJOJPJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$0h'hFVCJOJPJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$/hF/CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'heCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h LCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hFVCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hiCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h]CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 6G7G8G[xxx8hF/hJECJOJQJ]aJfHmH q sH 8hF/h,CJOJQJ]aJfHmH q sH 5h'h,CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h4h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'heCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hmCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hQCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH LLLL MM'M\MgMyMMMMMMM6Ṉ̖̱{`{H{-{5h'hu CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h4h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hmCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'heCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hQCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h,CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /hk(BCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 6N;NiNkNsNxNyNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!Oɮ{ɓcɓɓH5h'h~CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /hk(BCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hu CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hQCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hmCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH !O7O;O?ONO[OaObOgOmOnOrOOOOOOOOOOP PPPɱɖ{{{`E5h'hmCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h -CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /hk(BCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h~CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hbCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH PPPPPPPPPPQQQFQϴffK0f5h'h1CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h[CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'ha<CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /hk(BCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h -CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hbCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /hF/CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH  FQGQIQbQdQpQqQtQQQQQQQQQQQQRɮɮɓɓx]E]/h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h+CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hYoCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'ha<CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h1CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h[CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h^+CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH RR)R,R5RWRaRlRRRS S2SGSKSMSRSrSɮɮɮɖɮ{`{E{5h'h1CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h4h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hPCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /hk(BCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'htCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h+CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hNCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH rSvSxSySSSSSSST,T3TsT{TRUU̱̖dG-G-Gd3hk(B@CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 9h'hT~@CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hT~CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH -h'h1CJOJQJaJfHq 5h'h1CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h1CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hPCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /h4FCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH UUUUUMVQVVVVVV$W1W2W3W9Wɱɖ{`E``*E`*5h'hgCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h1CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h1CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h)wCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hpCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hT~CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h4h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 9WWWWX4X8XYXqXXXXXXXX%Yɮɓɓx`E*E5h4h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hVCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /haCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h -CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hgCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h)wCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h1CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h1CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH %Y)Y?YIY`YdY9ZCZZZ\ZdZeZfZgZkZɮɮɓ{`E5ha5CJOJQJ\aJfHmH q sH 5h'haCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /hYoCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h1CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hJECJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hVCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h)wCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH kZmZnZoZrZZZZZZZ.[2[\ \p\t\\ᨍuZu?5h'h8CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h4h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /haCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'htCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH ;h'ht5CJOJQJ\aJfHmH q sH 5ha5CJOJQJ\aJfHmH q sH ;h'ha5CJOJQJ\aJfHmH q sH gZZ]i^__aaewgikm!rXtxxx-}.}dgd' $da$gd'$ & Fda$gd'$ & Fde-D@&M a$gd'$de-D@&M a$gd'\]] ]!]]]]]^'^,^g^i^m^q^{^}^^^^^^^^^^{`E{{{``5h'h ACJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h[CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hLtCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /haCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h8CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'htCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h3CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH ^^_"_)_+_1_3_4_=_D_E_I_U_i_______________ɮɮɮɮɮɮɮ~~cH5h'h ACJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h4h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /haCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hLtCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h3CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h8CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH __``p`s`v```````aaaaaa̱̱̖̱̖{`{E{5h'h8CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h,J~CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h!CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h[CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h ACJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hLtCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /haCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH a"aaaeagahapataaaaaa;bGbNbObSbjblbmbqbbbbbbbbbbbbbb cccɮɖɖɖɮ{`{`{ɮ{`{``````5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h ACJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /haCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h8CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h!CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hKCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH %cccccs{s|s}ssssssss$t1t@tWtXṯ̖pp]J]J]/5h'h,J~CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH $h'h\(xCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hH".CJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hV5CJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hOMCJOJQJaJmH sH 5h'h`CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hV5CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hOMCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH Xthtntttttttttttt u uuu u䱖~cK/haCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hLCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /h'CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h>'uCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hZ3XCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /h4CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hZlCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH  u!u$u(u2u@uEuFuYu]uuuuuuuu#v&v0vevfvgvhvvvvɮɖ{````Eɖ5h'hE*CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hToCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h\(xCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /haCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hLCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hZlCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hc3CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH vvvvvvw w,w>wAwswwwwww>xExZx̱̱̖{{`E`5h'h}CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hReCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h>'uCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hToCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'hZlCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /haCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH Zx{xxxxxxxxxy yybygykylynyoyyyy̙mZGZGZ7Z7Z7Z7ZhF/CJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hJECJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hQCJOJQJaJmH sH *h'hP5CJOJQJ\aJmH sH *h'ha5CJOJQJ\aJmH sH 5h'h4FCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /h4FCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /haCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h6CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH yyyyyy$z.zzzd{h{j{k{{{{{{{{|| || |D|]|c|g||||||||}(})}*}+},}-}ںںںںڧڔځځځn$h'h?aCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hg}CJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hLCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hV=CJOJQJaJmH sH haCJOJQJaJmH sH hF/CJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hQCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hJECJOJQJaJmH sH +-}.}9}:}G}H}O}P}Q}U}y}}sX< X7hah~6@CJKH$OJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$7haha6@CJKH$OJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$4h'h~@CJKH$OJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$5h'h +CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH /haCJOJQJaJfHmH q sH 5h'h~CJOJQJaJfHmH q sH *h'h5CJOJQJ\aJmH sH *h'h45CJOJQJ\aJmH sH $hYo5CJOJQJ\aJmH sH  .}/}:}[~~łÅąƅDž dgdZlY$de-D@&M a$gd' $da$gd'$ & Fd-DM a$gd'$ & Fde-DM a$gd'$ & Fda$gd'dgd'}}}}X~Y~Z~[~g~h~q~~~~tYAY%Y7hah6@CJKH$OJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$.ha@CJKH$OJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$4h'h@CJKH$OJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$$h'h~CJOJQJaJmH sH 4h'hZ3X@CJKH$OJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$Dh'h~0J>*@B*CJKH$OJQJaJmH nH$phsH tH$4h'h~@CJKH$OJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$=jh'h~@CJKH$OJQJUaJmH nH$sH tH$ ~~IJ!ԻԅrbrNr-Ah'h|%S56CJOJQJ\]aJfHmH q sH 'hah6CJOJQJaJmH sH haCJOJQJaJmH sH $h'hCJOJQJaJmH sH 4h'hO56CJOJPJQJ\]aJmH sH 4h'hO56CJKH$OJQJ\]aJnH$tH$1hahO5CJKH$OJQJ\]aJnH$tH$0h'hO56CJOJQJ\]aJmH sH $h'hCJOJQJaJmH sH  !")*+rɀʀkJJ%JHh'h|%S0J56>*B*CJOJQJ\]aJmH nH$phsH tH$Ajh'h|%S56CJOJQJU\]aJmH nH$sH tH$5hah|%S5CJOJQJ\]aJmH nH$sH tH$8h'h|%S56CJOJQJ\]aJmH nH$sH tH$8h'h +56CJOJQJ\]aJmH nH$sH tH$Ah'h|%S56CJOJQJ\]aJfHmH q sH ;ha56CJOJQJ\]aJfHmH q sH  8;<=ɲə}d}D}D Fh'hE*0J5>*B*CJKH$OJQJ\aJmH nH$phsH tH$?jh'hE*5CJKH$OJQJU\aJmH nH$sH tH$0ha5CJKH$OJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$6h'hE*5CJKH$OJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$0h'hE*CJKH$OJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$,ha5CJOJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$2h'hE*5CJOJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$8h'hE*56CJOJQJ\]aJmH nH$sH tH$  CORĂłڂ܂ém^mD2"h'h05CJOJQJ\aJ2h'h05CJOJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$ha5CJOJQJ\aJ"h'hYo5CJOJQJ\aJ%hahYo56CJOJQJ\aJ,ha5CJOJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$2h'hYo5CJOJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$6h'hYo5CJKH$OJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$?jh'hE*5CJKH$OJQJU\aJmH nH$sH tH$ ܂݂~ƒŃƃǃ01诉whwR@R&R2h'h,J~0J5>*B*CJOJQJ\aJph"h'h,J~5CJOJQJ\aJ+jh'h,J~5CJOJQJU\aJha5CJOJQJ\aJ"h'h05CJOJQJ\aJKhah056@CJOJQJ\aJeh@fHq r@Khaha56@CJOJQJ\aJeh@fHq r@%hah056CJOJQJ\aJ.jhah056CJOJQJU\aJ rsÅąԽssYsF-0h'h|%SCJOJPJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$$h'hE*CJOJQJaJnH$tH$2h'h,J~0J5>*B*CJOJQJ\aJph+jh'h,J~5CJOJQJU\aJha5CJOJQJ\aJ"h'ha5CJOJQJ\aJ%haha56CJOJQJ\aJ,ha5CJOJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$2h'h,J~5CJOJQJ\aJmH nH$sH tH$"h'h,J~5CJOJQJ\aJąŅDžȅʅ˅ͅ΅Ѕх0h'h|%SCJOJPJQJaJmH nH$sH tH$hhZlYjhZlYUhBGjhBGUDžɅʅ̅ͅυЅ$de-D@&M a$gd'$a$ dgdZlY 21h:paj. A!"#$% w666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH66666666666666660666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666606p02&6FVfv2(&6FVfv&6FVfv&6FVfv&6FVfv&6FVfv&6FVfv8XV~ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@6666 OJPJQJ_HmH nH sH tH J`J Normal dCJ_HaJmH$sH$tH \@\ ~Naslov 1$<@&"5CJ KH OJPJQJ\^JaJ ^@^ |%SNaslov 2$<@&$56CJOJPJQJ\]^JaJ>A > Zadani font odlomkaViV 0Obi na tablica4 l4a .k . 0 Bez popisa Z/Z |%S Naslov 2 Char(56CJOJPJQJ\]^JaJtH 6U`6 |%S0 Hiperveza >*B*phcZv!Z |%S0Nerijeaeno spominjanjeB*ph`^\q V"V OMelementddd[$\$CJOJPJQJaJtH$X/1X ~ Naslov 1 Char&5CJ KH OJPJQJ\^JaJ tH :B: ZlY0 Zaglavlje  B#@/Q@ ZlY0Zaglavlje Char CJaJtH 8 @b8 ZlY0Podno~je  B#>/q> ZlY0 Podno~je Char CJaJtH >> h0 Tekst fusnoteCJaJ@/@ h0Tekst fusnote ChartH >& > h0Referenca fusnoteH*PK![Content_Types].xmlN0EH-J@%ǎǢ|ș$زULTB l,3;rØJB+$G]7O٭VR$I/ 9Bq❐8[ 5jZOGFLސ'KV߀7|7_}ߋ*Ke)w7÷||]0wÊx?_ڡљ  $ "D?ʐš$ h(rضsza$|%C$N+{f>A%>qy LQ9i3"Ip:TXc-C#=ԭty~Yͼ $㵰*[^^A놀 c2DATFǺ`4 ¢`Q7cJn~08hO7>dL+D]P-F$et'\D uEOBM} rffw[Bf=.!vͅh 03 ̲BHr뤓gH=JҞ_f:hn$O\ʧFn;/x&M#+d Lz_܏{=wnhXZeV+zúo⽩=IVcmvJWSFAe؊0 ;+߻ߌ֨Siգj~[iF?h;hc`y(lռPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 0_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!qi¡ theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] } & (((+ f%ky'IZ.2#5I6i79/<k?aAD"EFdF6GeHOIJKL6N!OPFQRrSU9W%YkZ\^_acxe?fvgAijkmo]qsXt uvZxy-}}~!܂ąCEFGHIKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrtuvwxyz{|}~gZ.}DžDJsfuuXvxxyw?wHw zzzzzzz&z'z*z-z4z5z>TCXC'E'EHHrKvKxKyKNNppbqgqkqlqnqoqqqqqqq}}((117777q8~8>>TCXC'E'EHHrKvKxKyKNNppbqgqkqlqnqoqqqqqqq}}V=O. Es7:h^h`o(. 8^8`hH. L^`LhH.  ^ `hH.  ^ `hH. xL^x`LhH. H^H`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.^`5B*o(ph() ^`hH. pL^p`LhH. @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PL^P`LhH.EsV=O.$$$$$$$$$>ݦg$$$$$$$$\`I 533,3f,jUIqy655C^VuN")b n5u~ rKG>L>!c3z!fDqJEi#wu hFL !<h<,jsRe-tZ$i&5&dS&,v'pj*^+, -Y`-H".A/00@$23 3^374V566b6-8: <^<a<$"=->F?ev?,%@+Aa7Ak(BxD]F4FG$HtH^:I_LOM>NP/QR|%S6S0bSm#T`TU$UIUV#VFVJVxV]WZ3XZlY[([?[Db]+^n _j"_`Na?a?`adWkd Jeaj k-)kZlQmrn0oToYoqb=stLt>'uv6wv)w]wpw~w4x\(x4x Gxywyz=&ztRzz}G}e~,J~^K~T~uW~+F/s2851?Em1WK4 AmY=HHW+No`W~ =`3S;h3  OBGp~4Ha 1"zAAE*8wz#9'r19~bbr<Pvjj1e(BL a +}u/x 6eL-p0tY?[5%p'qbB *+lp $Q|T(DRS586u7]0Nv?b!(V= LRt^ t'K{ -@'g+!UZ Vn~89Sg}/Ng8iQL)WC~%mvAZl }}@}h@UnknownG.[x Times New Roman5Symbol3. .[x Arial;(SimSun[SO7..{$ CalibriC.,.{$ Calibri LightA$BCambria Math"qdQzj @j @qr0}}KqHP $P Je2!xx-S0 Bostjan Petar Kure i  Oh+'0p   , 8 DPX`hBostjanNormalPetar Kurečić141Microsoft Office Word@^(@N-@ r j ՜.+,D՜.+,, hp|  @}  Naslov\ 8@ _PID_HLINKSA0|7Khttps://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155515vu\https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/13/3-major-reforms-nato-needs-to-keep-it-from-collapsing/vu\https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/13/3-major-reforms-nato-needs-to-keep-it-from-collapsing/H  Uhttps://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2018/08/29/a-world-without-nato/index.htmlM :https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/11/09/macr-n09.htmlDahttps://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2019/03/19/5-consequences-of-a-life-without-nato/1Mmailto:petar.kurecic@unin.hrj#mailto:peternelj.bostjan@gmail.com  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry FP4,r@1Table2WordDocument 4&SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8MsoDataStoreC,r,rXLJOUZCMRUMAFR==2C,r,rItem ;PropertiesUCompObj }   F+Dokument programa Microsoft Word 97 2003 MSWordDocWord.Document.89q