Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1087070
Guilt, Dangerousness and Liability in the Era of Pre-Crime – the Role of Criminology? To Adapt, or to Die, that is the Question!
Guilt, Dangerousness and Liability in the Era of Pre-Crime – the Role of Criminology? To Adapt, or to Die, that is the Question! // Monatschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 103 (2020), 3; 198-207 doi:10.1515/mks-2020-2054 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1087070 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Guilt, Dangerousness and Liability in the Era
of Pre-Crime – the Role of Criminology? To
Adapt, or to Die, that is the Question!
Autori
Getoš Kalac, Anna-Maria
Izvornik
Monatschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform (0026-9301) 103
(2020), 3;
198-207
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Concept of guilt ; Dangerousness ; Liability ; Pre-crime ; Transdisciplinarity
Sažetak
There is no doubt that, in terms of criminal policy, we have been living in an era of pre- crime for quite some time now. Whether we like it or not, times have changed and so has the general position on concepts of (criminal) guilt, dangerousness and liability. Whereas once there was a broad consensus that penal repression, at least in principle, should be executed in a strictly post-crime fashion, nowadays the same consensus has been reached on trading freedom (from penal repression) for (promised) security, long before an ‘actual crime’ might even be committed. In this regard the criminalisation of endangerment and risks only nomotechnically solves the issue of ‘actual’ vs. ‘potential’ crimes – in essence it merely creates a normative fiction of pre-crime crimes, whereas in reality ‘actual crimes’ do not exist at all. The starting point of criminalisation has clearly shifted away from the guilt of having committed a crime, to the mere dangerousness of potentially committing a crime, which potential as such is purely hypothetical and beyond the grasp of empirical proof. Such shift raises fundamental criminological and sociological questions, just as it highlights our obligation to process and shape this shift. The change of paradigm from post- to pre-crime also makes one wonder about the current and future role of criminology. It makes one wonder about criminology’s capacity to adapt and its willingness to take on a transdisciplinary lead role in scientising or even criminologising the pre-crime era. In the end it also makes one wonder whether such an engagement would be scientifically justified.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
HRZZ-UIP-2017-05-8876 - Hrvatski monitor nasilja - Istraživanje pojavnih oblika, uzroka i procesuiranja delinkventnog nasilja s fokusom na zaštiti posebno ranjivih skupina žrtava (CroViMo) (Getoš Kalac, Anna-Maria; Bezić, Reana, HRZZ - 2017-05) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Zagreb
Profili:
Anna-Maria Getoš Kalac
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus