Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1086510
Validity and Reliability of International Physical Activity Questionnaires for Adults across EU Countries: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
Validity and Reliability of International Physical Activity Questionnaires for Adults across EU Countries: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis // International journal of environmental research and public health, 17 (2020), 19; 7161, 23 doi:10.3390/ijerph17197161 (međunarodna recenzija, pregledni rad, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1086510 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Validity and Reliability of International
Physical
Activity Questionnaires for Adults across EU
Countries: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
Autori
Šember, Vedrana ; Meh, Kaja ; Sorić, Maroje ; Starc, Gregor ; Rocha, Paulo ; Jurak, Gregor
Izvornik
International journal of environmental research and public health (1660-4601) 17
(2020), 19;
7161, 23
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, pregledni rad, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
measurement characteristics ; policy ; European Union ; measurement properties ; language version ; IPAQ ; GPAQ ; EHIS-PAQ
Sažetak
This review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020138845) critically evaluates test- retest reliability, concurrent validity and criterion validity of different physical activity (PA) levels of three most commonly used international PA questionnaires (PAQs) in official language versions of European Union (EU): International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ- SF), Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), and European Health Interview Survey-Physical Activity Questionnaire (EHIS-PAQ). In total, 1749 abstracts were screened, 287 full-text articles were identified as relevant to the study objectives, and 20 studies were included. The studies’ results and quality were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires checklist. Results indicate that only ten EU countries validated official language versions of selected PAQs. A meta-analysis revealed that assessment of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) is the most relevant PA level outcome, since no publication bias in any of measurement properties was detected while test- retest reliability was moderately high (rw = 0.74), moderate for the criterion (rw = 0.41) and moderately-high for concurrent validity (rw = 0.72). Reporting of methods and results of the studies was poor, with an overall moderate risk of bias with a total score of 0.43. In conclusion, where only self- reporting of PA is feasible, assessment of MVPA with selected PAQs in EU adult populations is recommended
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita, Kineziologija
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE