Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1086103
Experimental validation of Monte Carlo based treatment planning system in bone density equivalent media
Experimental validation of Monte Carlo based treatment planning system in bone density equivalent media // Radiology and oncology, 54 (2020), 4; 495-504 doi:10.2478/raon-2020-0051 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1086103 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Experimental validation of Monte Carlo based
treatment planning system in bone density
equivalent media
Autori
Smilović Radojčić, Đeni ; Casar, Božidar ; Rajlić, David ; Švabic Kolacio, Manda ; Mendez, Ignasi ; Obajdin, Nevena ; Dundara Debeljuh, Dea ; Jurković, Slaven
Izvornik
Radiology and oncology (1318-2099) 54
(2020), 4;
495-504
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
treatment planning system ; dose-to-medium ; dose-to-water ; experimental validation of dose calculation ; Monte Carlo
Sažetak
Introduction. Advanced, Monte Carlo (MC) based dose calculation algorithms, determine absorbed dose as dose to medium-in-medium (Dm, m) or dose to water-in-medium (Dw, m). Some earlier studies identified the differences in the absorbed doses related to the calculation mode, especially in the bone density equivalent (BDE) media. Since the calculation algorithms built in the treatment planning systems (TPS) should be dosimetrically verified before their use, we analyzed dose differences between two calculation modes for the Elekta Monaco TPS. We compared them with experimentally determined values, aiming to define a supplement to the existing TPS verification methodology. Materials and methods. In our study, we used a 6 MV photon beam from a linear accelerator. To evaluate the accuracy of the TPS calculation approaches, measurements with a Farmer type chamber in a semi-anthropomorphic phantom were compared to those obtained by two calculation options. The comparison was made for three parts of the phantom having different densities, with a focus on the BDE part. Results. Measured and calculated doses were in agreement for water and lung equivalent density materials, regardless of the calculation mode. However, in the BDE part of the phantom, mean dose differences between the calculation options ranged from 5.7 to 8.3%, depending on the method used. In the BDE part of the phantom, neither of the two calculation options were consistent with experimentally determined absorbed doses. Conclusions. Based on our findings, we proposed a supplement to the current methodology for the verification of commercial MC based TPS by performing additional measurements in BDE material.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Fizika, Temeljne medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka,
Opća bolnica Pula,
Klinički bolnički centar Rijeka
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE