Naslov
Online survey about the STROBE statement highlighted diverging views about its content, purpose, and value

Autori
Sharp, Melissa K. ; Glonti, Ketevan ; Hren, Darko

Izvornik
Journal of clinical epidemiology (0895-4356) 123 (2020); 100-106

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Observational studies Epidemiologic research design Guidelines as topic Information dissemination/methods STROBE Reporting guidelines

Sažetak
Abstract Background and objective The endorsement rates of The STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement are low and little is known about authors’ opinions about this reporting guideline. We conducted an online survey with observational study authors on attitude toward and experiences with the STROBE Statement with the aim of understanding how to effectively implement STROBE. Methods A thematic analysis on the responses to an open-ended question was conducted using inductive coding. Two coders classified responses independently into themes using a codebook. The inter-rater agreement ranged from 87.7 to 99.9%. Results 15% (n = 150) of survey participants (n = 1, 015) shared perceptions and insights on STROBE. We established four themes: 1) perceptions of the checklist, 2) academic confidence, 3) use in education and training, and 4) journal endorsement and use in peer review. Views were diverse and revealed multiple misunderstandings about the checklist's purpose and content, and lack of incentives for its use. Conclusions Better communication efforts are needed when disseminating STROBE and other reporting guidelines. These should focus on content, education for early career researchers, and encouragement of critical self-reflection on one's own work. In addition, results emphasized the need for better incentive and enforcement mechanisms.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita, Psihologija, Pedagogija

POVEZANOST RADA