Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1073985
Malignancy risk with atypia of undetermined significance finding on thyroid nodule FNA: clinical experience from a tertiary institution
Malignancy risk with atypia of undetermined significance finding on thyroid nodule FNA: clinical experience from a tertiary institution // Acta clinica Croatica, 58 (2019), 2; 333-336 doi:10.20471/acc.2019.58.02.17 (recenziran, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1073985 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Malignancy risk with atypia of undetermined
significance finding on thyroid nodule FNA:
clinical experience from a tertiary institution
Autori
Staničić, Josip ; Kust, Davor ; Mateša, Neven ; Kusić Zvonko
Izvornik
Acta clinica Croatica (0353-9466) 58
(2019), 2;
333-336
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Biopsy, fine-needle ; Thyroid nodule ; Thyroid neoplasms ; Cytodiagnosis ; Adenocarcinoma, follicular
Sažetak
The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology from 2009 introduced a new category in thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration (FNA) findings named atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), which usually appears in around 5% of FNA findings. Our study aimed to assess the utility of AUS finding in determining the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules. In our study, 160 patients with AUS finding on initial FNA were regularly followed-up. Total and specific malignancy rates were calculated after receiving histopathologic confirmation or histopathologic/cytologic exclusion of malignancy. Eventually 80 (50%) patients were referred to surgery, with malignancy rate of 37.5% on histopathology. Another 52 (32.5%) patients were confirmed to have benign nodules on repeat FNA. After combining results obtained from histopathologic reports with those obtained from cytologic follow-up, total malignancy rate was 22.72%. However, malignancy was confirmed in only one (5.26%) of 19 patients with AUS finding on repeat FNA with surgical and histopathologic follow-up. In conclusion, FNA is an extremely useful tool for clinicians to discriminate patients to be referred to surgery and those that can be followed-up safely without the need for further invasive procedures.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Temeljne medicinske znanosti, Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
KBC "Sestre Milosrdnice"
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE