Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1070740
Effectiveness and efficacy of nutritional therapy: A systematic review following Cochrane methodology
Effectiveness and efficacy of nutritional therapy: A systematic review following Cochrane methodology // Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh), 36 (2017), 4; 939-957 doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.06.022 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1070740 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Effectiveness and efficacy of nutritional therapy:
A systematic review following Cochrane methodology
Autori
Muscaritoli, Maurizio ; Krznarić, Zeljko ; Singer, Pierre ; Barazzoni, Rocco ; Cederholm, Tommy ; Golay, Alain ; Van Gossum, André ; Kennedy, Nicholas ; Kreymann, Georg ; Laviano, Alessandro ; Pavić, Tajana ; Puljak, Livia ; Sambunjak, Dario ; Utrobičić, Ana ; Schneider, Stéphane M.
Izvornik
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh) (0261-5614) 36
(2017), 4;
939-957
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Cochrane ; Effectiveness ; Efficacy ; Nutritional therapy
Sažetak
Background & aims: Disease-related malnutrition has deleterious consequences on patients' outcome and healthcare costs. The demonstration of improved outcome by appropriate nutritional management is on occasion difficult. The European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) appointed the Nutrition Education Study Group (ESPEN-NESG) to increase recognition of nutritional knowledge and support in health services. Methods: To obtain the best available evidence on the potential effects of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality and hospital stay ; cost of malnutrition ; effect of nutritional treatment on outcome parameters and pharmaco-economics of nutritional therapy, a systematic review of the literature was performed following Cochrane methodology, to answer the following key questions: Q1) Is malnutrition an independent predictive factor for readmission within 30 days from hospital discharge? Q2) Does nutritional therapy reduce the risk of readmission within 30 days from hospital discharge? Q3) Is nutritional therapy cost- effective/does it reduce costs in hospitalized patients? and Q4) Is nutritional therapy cost effective/does it reduce costs in outpatients? Results: For Q1 six of 15 identified observational studies indicated that malnutrition was predictive of re-admissions, whereas the remainder did not. For Q2 nine randomized controlled trials and two meta- analyses gave non-conclusive results whether re-admissions could be reduced by nutritional therapy. Economic benefit and cost- effectiveness of nutritional therapy was consistently reported in 16 identified studies for hospitalized patients (Q3), whereas the heterogeneous and limited corresponding data on out-patients (Q4) indicated cost-benefits in some selected sub-groups. Conclusions: This result of this review supports the use of nutritional therapy to reduce healthcare costs, most evident from large, homogeneous studies. In general, reports are too heterogeneous and overall of limited quality for conclusions on impact of malnutrition and its treatment on readmissions.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Zagreb,
Medicinski fakultet, Split,
Hrvatsko katoličko sveučilište, Zagreb
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE