Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1070728
Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Systematic Reviews of Interventions for Postoperative Pain in Children: Comparison Against the Recommended Core Outcome Set
Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Systematic Reviews of Interventions for Postoperative Pain in Children: Comparison Against the Recommended Core Outcome Set // Pain Medicine, 19 (2017), 11; 2316-2321 doi:10.1093/pm/pnx255 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1070728 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Systematic
Reviews of Interventions for Postoperative Pain
in Children: Comparison Against the Recommended
Core Outcome Set
Autori
Boric, Krste ; Dosenovic, Svjetlana ; Jelicic Kadic, Antonia ; Boric, Matija ; Jeric, Milka ; Puljak, Livia
Izvornik
Pain Medicine (1526-2375) 19
(2017), 11;
2316-2321
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
pain ; core outcome set
Sažetak
Objective: To investigate the range of efficacy and safety outcomes used in systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions for postoperative pain in children and compare them with outcome domains recommended in the Pediatric Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (PedIMMPACT). Methods: Five electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Two review authors extracted outcome data independently. Efficacy and safety outcomes were extracted and categorized. The type and number of outcomes were analyzed and compared against the outcomes recommended by PedIMMPACT. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42015029654). Results: We included 48 systematic reviews with data from 816 trials. The median number of all outcomes was 4, while the median number of the PedIMMPACT core outcomes was three out of six. The most commonly reported outcome of the PedIMMPACT Core Outcome set (COS) was "symptoms and adverse events, " followed by pain intensity, which was reported in 75% of the included SRs. Just over half of the SRs that included a pain intensity outcome also indicated the specific pain assessment tool used in the methods section. Conclusions: Systematic reviews in the field of pediatric pain do not use the recommended COS. Nor do they consistently include pain as an outcome. This makes comparisons of efficacy and safety across interventions very difficult. Future studies should explore whether the authors are aware of the COS and whether the recommended COS is appropriate.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
KBC Split,
Medicinski fakultet, Split
Profili:
Milka Jerić
(autor)
Livia Puljak
(autor)
Krste Borić
(autor)
Matija Borić
(autor)
Svjetlana Došenović
(autor)
Antonia Jeličić Kadić
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE