Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1069601
Roman slavery in non-legal texts – how to sell a slave with a defect?
Roman slavery in non-legal texts – how to sell a slave with a defect? // 23rd Annual Forum of Young Legal Historians: History of Law and Other Humanities: Views of the Legal Culture across the Time
Napulj, Italija, 2017. (predavanje, podatak o recenziji nije dostupan, neobjavljeni rad, ostalo)
CROSBI ID: 1069601 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Roman slavery in non-legal texts – how to sell a
slave with a defect?
Autori
Sukačić, Marko
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, neobjavljeni rad, ostalo
Skup
23rd Annual Forum of Young Legal Historians: History of Law and Other Humanities: Views of the Legal Culture across the Time
Mjesto i datum
Napulj, Italija, 30.05.2017. - 01.06.2017
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Podatak o recenziji nije dostupan
Ključne riječi
emptio venditio ; slave ; morbus et vitium
Sažetak
The aim of this presentation is to show how was the slavery perceived and displayed in non-legal texts written in the era of ancient Roman culture, with emphasize on the slaves with certain defects. Many authors, whether they dealt with law or they were artists, wrote on the topic of slavery and slaves, with different approach. Since slavery was socially acceptable in ancient times, the idea of this presentation is to compare how the playwrights and other authors observed and wrote about it. It can be debated how the sale of slaves actually looked like, and more importantly, the declaration of defects of the slaves. Cicero claims (Cic. de Off. III.17) that in the sale of slaves every form of deception on the vendor's part is disallowed. This paper will examine in which way the conflict was resolved if declaration was false, or in case it did not occur at all. Curule aediles had an important role in this matter, especially with their Edict, which is not preserved in the original form. Yet, there are certain non-legal texts, which allow exploring this question. One such is Aulus Gellius Noctes Atticae (Liber IV, II) where he explains the difference between a disease and a defect (morbus et vitium), and the force of those terms in the aediles' edict. In addition, he gives interesting examples on this topic, and debate whether eunuchs and barren women could be returned, if the buyer did not know that kind of ‘’defect’’ of slaves. On these examples, the paper will discuss how non-legal sources help to understand certain institutes of Roman law and Roman legal tradition. By doing so, this paper will demonstrate the connection between law and humanities, and the necessity to use other sources beside legal one.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo