Pretraga

Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1068101

In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance

Propadalo, Ivana; Tranfic, Mia; Vuka, Ivana; Barcot, Ognjen; Pericic, Tina Poklepovic; Puljak, Livia
In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 106 (2019), 10-17 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.002 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)

CROSBI ID: 1068101 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance

Autori
Propadalo, Ivana ; Tranfic, Mia ; Vuka, Ivana ; Barcot, Ognjen ; Pericic, Tina Poklepovic ; Puljak, Livia

Izvornik
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (0895-4356) 106 (2019); 10-17

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Bias ; Risk of bias ; Systematic reviews ; Cochrane ; Allocation concealment ; Quality Standards

Sažetak
Objectives The aim of the article was to analyze whether the risk of bias (RoB) judgments for allocation concealment in Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) were in line with recommendations from the Cochrane Handbook. Study Design and Setting From CSR, we extracted data about judgments and supporting comments about allocation concealment for each included randomized controlled trial (RCT). We compared whether judgments for supporting comments were in line with Cochrane Handbook recommendations. Results We analyzed judgments and comments of 721 CSRs in which 10, 280 RCTs were included. By following the Cochrane Handbook guidance, we found that judgments for allocation concealment were discrepant for 2, 928 trials (29%). Most discrepancies were made for trials where RoB was judged as low (2, 693 trials ; 92%). Cochrane authors used 66 categories of comments describing envelopes as a method of allocation concealment. In 66 envelope-related categories, describing RoB assessments from 1, 529 (15%) of the analyzed RCTs, most of the judgments were low RoB, although only one of those categories is associated with low RoB according to the Cochrane Handbook. Twenty categories of supporting comments, including 642 trials, were related to randomization, not allocation concealment. Conclusion One-third of RoB judgments about allocation concealment in Cochrane reviews were discrepant from the Cochrane Handbook recommendations.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita



POVEZANOST RADA

Ustanove:
KBC Split,
Medicinski fakultet, Split,
Hrvatsko katoličko sveučilište, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Tina Poklepović Peričić (autor)

Avatar Url Ognjen Barčot (autor)

Avatar Url Mia Tranfić Duplančić (autor)

Avatar Url Ivana Propadalo (autor)

Avatar Url Livia Puljak (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Propadalo, Ivana; Tranfic, Mia; Vuka, Ivana; Barcot, Ognjen; Pericic, Tina Poklepovic; Puljak, Livia
In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 106 (2019), 10-17 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.002 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Propadalo, I., Tranfic, M., Vuka, I., Barcot, O., Pericic, T. & Puljak, L. (2019) In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 106, 10-17 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.002.
@article{article, author = {Propadalo, Ivana and Tranfic, Mia and Vuka, Ivana and Barcot, Ognjen and Pericic, Tina Poklepovic and Puljak, Livia}, year = {2019}, pages = {10-17}, DOI = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.002}, keywords = {Bias, Risk of bias, Systematic reviews, Cochrane, Allocation concealment, Quality Standards}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Epidemiology}, doi = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.002}, volume = {106}, issn = {0895-4356}, title = {In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance}, keyword = {Bias, Risk of bias, Systematic reviews, Cochrane, Allocation concealment, Quality Standards} }
@article{article, author = {Propadalo, Ivana and Tranfic, Mia and Vuka, Ivana and Barcot, Ognjen and Pericic, Tina Poklepovic and Puljak, Livia}, year = {2019}, pages = {10-17}, DOI = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.002}, keywords = {Bias, Risk of bias, Systematic reviews, Cochrane, Allocation concealment, Quality Standards}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Epidemiology}, doi = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.002}, volume = {106}, issn = {0895-4356}, title = {In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance}, keyword = {Bias, Risk of bias, Systematic reviews, Cochrane, Allocation concealment, Quality Standards} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE

Citati:

    Altmetrijski pokazatelji:


    Podijeli:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font
    CROSBI koristi kolačiće (cookies) kako bi poboljšao funkcionalnost stranice.