Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1067405

Nature conservation versus forestry activities in protected areas - the stakeholders’ point of view


Paletto, Alessandro; Laktić, Tomislav; Posavec, Stjepan; Dobšinska, Zuzana; Marić, Bruno; Đorđević, Ilija; Trajkov, Pande; Kitchoukov, Emil; Pezdevšek Malovrh, Špela
Nature conservation versus forestry activities in protected areas - the stakeholders’ point of view // Šumarski list : znanstveno-stručno i staleško glasilo Hrvatskoga šumarskog društva, 143 (2019), 7-8; 307-318 doi:10.31298/sl.143.7-8.2 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1067405 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Nature conservation versus forestry activities in protected areas - the stakeholders’ point of view

Autori
Paletto, Alessandro ; Laktić, Tomislav ; Posavec, Stjepan ; Dobšinska, Zuzana ; Marić, Bruno ; Đorđević, Ilija ; Trajkov, Pande ; Kitchoukov, Emil ; Pezdevšek Malovrh, Špela

Izvornik
Šumarski list : znanstveno-stručno i staleško glasilo Hrvatskoga šumarskog društva (0373-1332) 143 (2019), 7-8; 307-318

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
protected areas ; Natura 2000 network ; participatory process ; conflicts ; consultation ; questionnaire survey

Sažetak
Implementation of nature conservation policy follows two main approaches: the segregation approach based on the spatially separation of protected areas from productive areas, and the integration approach based on the integration of productive and conservation purposes. In many cases, the implementation of nature conservation policy has increased conflicts due to different and competing land use principles, interests, and point of views. The aim of this study is to analyse the stakeholders’ opinions towards possible conflicts, opportunities and obstacles for human activities, and constraints on forest management related to establishment of a new protected area. The study was structured in three main steps: stakeholder analysis, questionnaire survey, and statistical analysis of the collected data. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered by email to a sample of stakeholders in each county involved in the COST Targeted Network TN1401 “CAPABAL” (41 stakeholders in 10 countries). The data were statistically processed to highlight differences between EU28 member countries and non- EU28 countries, and among groups of interest (public administrations, actors of forest-wood chain, universities and research institutes, environmental Non-Governmental Organizations). The results show that the most common type of conflict is that related to the procedure for the establishment of a new protected area with special regard to property rights restrictions and additional bureaucracy. In addition, the results show that the most important opportunity is for the rural development of the marginal areas with special regard to the eco-tourism development, while the most important obstacle is the decrease of forest management practices (loggings) due to the nature conservation constrains.The stakeholders’ point of view is a fundamental starting point to reduce conflicts between nature conservation and human activities and to increase the social acceptance of the nature conservation policy.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Šumarstvo, Interdisciplinarne biotehničke znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Fakultet šumarstva i drvne tehnologije

Profili:

Avatar Url Bruno Marić (autor)

Avatar Url Stjepan Posavec (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi hrcak.srce.hr www.sumari.hr

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Paletto, Alessandro; Laktić, Tomislav; Posavec, Stjepan; Dobšinska, Zuzana; Marić, Bruno; Đorđević, Ilija; Trajkov, Pande; Kitchoukov, Emil; Pezdevšek Malovrh, Špela
Nature conservation versus forestry activities in protected areas - the stakeholders’ point of view // Šumarski list : znanstveno-stručno i staleško glasilo Hrvatskoga šumarskog društva, 143 (2019), 7-8; 307-318 doi:10.31298/sl.143.7-8.2 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Paletto, A., Laktić, T., Posavec, S., Dobšinska, Z., Marić, B., Đorđević, I., Trajkov, P., Kitchoukov, E. & Pezdevšek Malovrh, Š. (2019) Nature conservation versus forestry activities in protected areas - the stakeholders’ point of view. Šumarski list : znanstveno-stručno i staleško glasilo Hrvatskoga šumarskog društva, 143 (7-8), 307-318 doi:10.31298/sl.143.7-8.2.
@article{article, author = {Paletto, Alessandro and Lakti\'{c}, Tomislav and Posavec, Stjepan and Dob\v{s}inska, Zuzana and Mari\'{c}, Bruno and \DJor\djevi\'{c}, Ilija and Trajkov, Pande and Kitchoukov, Emil and Pezdev\v{s}ek Malovrh, \v{S}pela}, year = {2019}, pages = {307-318}, DOI = {10.31298/sl.143.7-8.2}, keywords = {protected areas, Natura 2000 network, participatory process, conflicts, consultation, questionnaire survey}, journal = {\v{S}umarski list : znanstveno-stru\v{c}no i stale\v{s}ko glasilo Hrvatskoga \v{s}umarskog dru\v{s}tva}, doi = {10.31298/sl.143.7-8.2}, volume = {143}, number = {7-8}, issn = {0373-1332}, title = {Nature conservation versus forestry activities in protected areas - the stakeholders’ point of view}, keyword = {protected areas, Natura 2000 network, participatory process, conflicts, consultation, questionnaire survey} }
@article{article, author = {Paletto, Alessandro and Lakti\'{c}, Tomislav and Posavec, Stjepan and Dob\v{s}inska, Zuzana and Mari\'{c}, Bruno and \DJor\djevi\'{c}, Ilija and Trajkov, Pande and Kitchoukov, Emil and Pezdev\v{s}ek Malovrh, \v{S}pela}, year = {2019}, pages = {307-318}, DOI = {10.31298/sl.143.7-8.2}, keywords = {protected areas, Natura 2000 network, participatory process, conflicts, consultation, questionnaire survey}, journal = {\v{S}umarski list : znanstveno-stru\v{c}no i stale\v{s}ko glasilo Hrvatskoga \v{s}umarskog dru\v{s}tva}, doi = {10.31298/sl.143.7-8.2}, volume = {143}, number = {7-8}, issn = {0373-1332}, title = {Nature conservation versus forestry activities in protected areas - the stakeholders’ point of view}, keyword = {protected areas, Natura 2000 network, participatory process, conflicts, consultation, questionnaire survey} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font