Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1062276
The Deep State between the (Un)Warranted Conspiracy Theory and Structural Element of Political Regimes?
The Deep State between the (Un)Warranted Conspiracy Theory and Structural Element of Political Regimes? // Critique and Humanism Journal, 49 (2018), 1; 369-384 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1062276 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
The Deep State between the (Un)Warranted
Conspiracy Theory and Structural Element of
Political Regimes?
Autori
Blanuša, Nebojša
Izvornik
Critique and Humanism Journal (0861-1718) 49
(2018), 1;
369-384
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
deep state ; conspiracy theory ; parapolitics ; transitology ; knowledge
Sažetak
This paper tries to address a more general issue of conspiracy theories as knowledge, its (mis)treatments, selective and biased use, as well as specific features and outcomes of different epistemic approaches to conspiracy theories important for further clarification of this field of research. Following that, the author tries to explain why the ‘deep state’ is a good candidate for such a research of conspiratorial knowledge as a field of contesting interpretations. Conceptually speaking, the ‘deep state’ is considered as a sort of systemic, political arch-conspiracy, or the parapolitical structure organized for permanent conspiratorial enterprises. In that sense, it functions as a metaphorical umbrella for state conspiracies and includes many contested singular conspiracy theories. Furthermore, it will be shown, through the analysis of the current scholarly literature on the ‘deep state’, how the knowledge produced by those scholars who believe in its existence can be contested and compared with (non) conspiratorial public interpretations, and other experts’ arguments who are not ‘enchanted’ by this concept. The purpose of such research would be to explore differences in argumentation, providing a basis for evidence-building and alternative explanations between these various groups of social agents. Based on this information, further more rigorous social science research should enable us to build the criteria for differentiation between warranted and unwarranted conspiratorial scepticism.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Politologija, Psihologija, Interdisciplinarne društvene znanosti
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka::
- Central and East European Online Library - CEEOL
- ERIH PLUS