Naslov
Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.

Autori
Hauser SL ; Bar-Or A ; Comi G ; Giovannoni G1 ; Hartung HP ; , Hemmer B ; Lublin F ; Montalban X ; Rammohan KW ; Selmaj K ; Traboulsee A ; Wolinsky JS ; Arnold DL ; Klingelschmitt G ; Masterman D ; Fontoura P ; Belachew S ; Chin P ; Mairon N ; Garren H ; Kappos L ; OPERA I and OPERA II Clinical Investigators (...Basic, Silvio...).

Izvornik
The New England journal of medicine (0028-4793) 376 (2017), 3; 221-234

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Ocrelizumab ; Interferon Beta-1a ; Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Sažetak
BACKGROUND: B cells influence the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes CD20+ B cells. METHODS: In two identical phase 3 trials, we randomly assigned 821 and 835 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis to receive intravenous ocrelizumab at a dose of 600 mg every 24 weeks or subcutaneous interferon beta-1a at a dose of 44 μg three times weekly for 96 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. RESULTS: The annualized relapse rate was lower with ocrelizumab than with interferon beta-1a in trial 1 (0.16 vs. 0.29 ; 46% lower rate with ocrelizumab ; P<0.001) and in trial 2 (0.16 vs. 0.29 ; 47% lower rate ; P<0.001). In prespecified pooled analyses, the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks was significantly lower with ocrelizumab than with interferon beta-1a (9.1% vs. 13.6% ; hazard ratio, 0.60 ; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.81 ; P<0.001), as was the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 24 weeks (6.9% vs. 10.5% ; hazard ratio, 0.60 ; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.84 ; P=0.003). The mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions per T1-weighted magnetic resonance scan was 0.02 with ocrelizumab versus 0.29 with interferon beta-1a in trial 1 (94% lower number of lesions with ocrelizumab, P<0.001) and 0.02 versus 0.42 in trial 2 (95% lower number of lesions, P<0.001). The change in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite score (a composite measure of walking speed, upper-limb movements, and cognition ; for this z score, negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement) significantly favored ocrelizumab over interferon beta-1a in trial 2 (0.28 vs. 0.17, P=0.004) but not in trial 1 (0.21 vs. 0.17, P=0.33). Infusion-related reactions occurred in 34.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab. Serious infection occurred in 1.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 2.9% of those treated with interferon beta-1a. Neoplasms occurred in 0.5% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 0.2% of those treated with interferon beta-1a. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis, ocrelizumab was associated with lower rates of disease activity and progression than interferon beta-1a over a period of 96 weeks. Larger and longer studies of the safety of ocrelizumab are required. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche ; OPERA I and II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01247324 and NCT01412333 , respectively.).

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti

POVEZANOST RADA