Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1053893
A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals // BMJ Open, 7 (2017), 10; e017468, 5 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017468 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1053893 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks
of peer reviewers in the manuscript review
process in biomedical journals
Autori
Glonti, Ketevan ; Cauchi, Daniel ; Cobo, Erik ; Boutron, Isabelle ; Moher, David ; Hren, Darko
Izvornik
BMJ Open (2044-6055) 7
(2017), 10;
E017468, 5
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Biomedical publishing ; Competencies ; Peer review ; Roles ; Scoping review ; Tasks
Sažetak
INTRODUCTION: The primary functions of peer reviewers are poorly defined. Thus far no body of literature has systematically identified the roles and tasks of peer reviewers of biomedical journals. A clear establishment of these can lead to improvements in the peer review process. The purpose of this scoping review is to determine what is known on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers. METHODS: We will use the methodological framework first proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and subsequently adapted by Levac et al and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The scoping review will include all study designs, as well as editorials, commentaries and grey literature. The following eight electronic databases will be searched (from inception to May 2017): Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Educational Resources Information Center, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science. Two reviewers will use inclusion and exclusion criteria based on the 'Population-Concept-Context' framework to independently screen titles and abstracts of articles considered for inclusion. Full-text screening of relevant eligible articles will also be carried out by two reviewers. The search strategy for grey literature will include searching in websites of existing networks, biomedical journal publishers and organisations that offer resources for peer reviewers. In addition we will review journal guidelines to peer reviewers on how to perform the manuscript review. Journals will be selected using the 2016 journal impact factor. We will identify and assess the top five, middle five and lowest- ranking five journals across all medical specialties. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review will undertake a secondary analysis of data already collected and does not require ethical approval. The results will be disseminated through journals and conferences targeting stakeholders involved in peer review in biomedical research.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Informacijske i komunikacijske znanosti, Biotehnologija u biomedicini (prirodno područje, biomedicina i zdravstvo, biotehničko područje)
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
Miror H2020 ITN MSCA 676207
Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet u Splitu
Profili:
Darko Hren
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE