Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1053889
No difference in knowledge obtained from infographic or plain language summary of a Cochrane systematic review: three randomized controlled trials
No difference in knowledge obtained from infographic or plain language summary of a Cochrane systematic review: three randomized controlled trials // Journal of clinical epidemiology, 97 (2018), 86-94 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.003 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1053889 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
No difference in knowledge obtained from
infographic or plain language summary of a
Cochrane systematic review: three randomized
controlled trials
Autori
Buljan, Ivan ; Malički, Mario ; Wager, Elizabeth ; Puljak, Livia ; Hren, Darko ; Kellie, Frances ; West, Helen ; Alfirević, Žarko ; Marušić, Ana
Izvornik
Journal of clinical epidemiology (0895-4356) 97
(2018);
86-94
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Cochrane systematic reviews ; Consumers ; Doctors ; Infographic ; Information translation ; Plain language summaries ; Students
Sažetak
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the usefulness of an infographic in the translation of knowledge about health information from a Cochrane systematic review to lay and professional populations in comparison to a plain language summary (PLS) and scientific abstract (SA). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted three parallel randomized trials with university students (n = 171), consumers (n = 99), and doctors (n = 64), to examine the effect of different summary formats of a Cochrane systematic review on the knowledge about health information presented in the review, reading experience, and perceived user-friendliness. In the trials involving students and doctors, an infographic was compared to a PLS and a SA, while in those with consumers, an infographic was compared to a PLS. RESULTS: We found no difference in knowledge between the infographic and the text-based PLS in any of the trials or in the whole participant sample. All three participant groups preferred the infographic and gave it higher ratings for reading experience (d = 0.48 in the overall sample) and user- friendliness (d = 0.46 in the overall sample). CONCLUSION: Although the infographic format was perceived as more enjoyable for reading, it was not better than a traditional, text-based PLS in the translation of knowledge about findings from a Cochrane systematic review.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Split,
Filozofski fakultet u Splitu,
Hrvatsko katoličko sveučilište, Zagreb
Profili:
Ivan Buljan
(autor)
Darko Hren
(autor)
Ivan Buljan
(autor)
Ana Marušić
(autor)
Žarko Alfirević
(autor)
Livia Puljak
(autor)
Mario Malički
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE