Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1050524
Ne bis in idem in European Criminal Law – Moving in Circles?
Ne bis in idem in European Criminal Law – Moving in Circles? // ECLIC- EU AND COMPARATIVE LAW ISSUES AND CHALLENGES SERIES (ECLIC 3) - International Scientific Conference “EU and Member States – legal and economic issues“ / Duić, Dunja ; Petrašević, Tunjica (ur.) (ur.).
Osijek: University Josip Juraj Strossmayer of Osijek Faculty of Law Osijek, 2019. str. 507-520 doi:10.25234/eclic/9015 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1050524 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Ne bis in idem in European Criminal Law – Moving in
Circles?
Autori
Burić, Zoran
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
ECLIC- EU AND COMPARATIVE LAW ISSUES AND CHALLENGES SERIES (ECLIC 3) - International Scientific Conference “EU and Member States – legal and economic issues“
/ Duić, Dunja ; Petrašević, Tunjica (ur.) - Osijek : University Josip Juraj Strossmayer of Osijek Faculty of Law Osijek, 2019, 507-520
ISBN
978-953-8109-29-4
Skup
International Scientific Conference EU and Member States – legal and economic issues 2019
Mjesto i datum
Osijek, Hrvatska, 06.06.2019. - 07.06.2019
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
ne bis in idem, European criminal law, duplication of administrative and crimi-nal proceedings
Sažetak
Current article takes a closer look at the dialogue between the Strasbourg and the Luxembourg courts on the interpretation of the ne bis in idem principle and analyses how it influenced the (non)acceptance of the possibility to conduct both, criminal and administrative penal proceed- ings, against the same person for the same acts. It starts with the pre-Zolotukhin jurisprudence of the European Court for Human Rights and analyses how the Luxembourg interpretation of Article 54 CISA had a major influence on the change in the way the Strasbourg court per-ceived the possibility to conduct both, criminal and administrative penal proceedings, against the same person for the same acts. It further explores how the Luxembourg court followed the way indicated by Zolotukhin and accepted the stance of the Strasbourg court on the possibility of duplication of criminal and administrative penal proceedings against the same person for the same acts under the ne bis in idem protection afforded to individuals by Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Finally, it analyses whether the recent shift in the Strasbourg court’s jurisprudence, which was also followed by the Luxembourg court, means that the ne bis in idem principle in European criminal law has, on the question of the duplication of criminal and administrative penal proceedings, basically come to the positions which were dominant in the pre-Zolotukhin jurisprudence.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Sciences & Humanities (CPCI-SSH)
- HeinOnline