Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1032553
Complexity of the interpretability logic IL
Complexity of the interpretability logic IL // Logic and Applications 2018 Book of Abstracts
Dubrovnik, Hrvatska, 2018. str. 54-55 (predavanje, nije recenziran, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1032553 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Complexity of the interpretability logic IL
Autori
Mikec, Luka ; Pakhomov, Fedor ; Vuković, Mladen
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
Logic and Applications 2018 Book of Abstracts
/ - , 2018, 54-55
Skup
Logic and Applications 2018
Mjesto i datum
Dubrovnik, Hrvatska, 24.09.2018. - 28.09.2018
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Nije recenziran
Ključne riječi
interpretability logic, Veltman semantics, decidability, complexity, PSPACE
Sažetak
This talk is based on the paper [MPV18]. Computational complexity of modal logics was first studied by Ladner [Lad77]. Various tableau– based methods were used in proofs of PSPACE– decidability of a number of modal logics (like K, K4, S4 etc ; see [Lad77] and [Spa93]). PSPACE– completeness of the satisfiability problem (and also of the decision problem, since co-PSPACE = PSPACE) for the closed fragments of modal systems K4, S4, Grz and GL is proved by Chagrov and Rybakov [CR03]. Shapirovsky [Sha10] proved the PSPACE– decidability of propositional polymodal provability logic GLP. PSPACE–completeness of the closed fragment of the system GLP is proved by Pakhomov in [Pak14]. The interpretability logic IL, introduced by Visser [Vis90], is an extension of provability logic with a binary modal operator B. This operator stands for interpretability, considered as a relation between extensions of a fixed theory. Bou and Joosten proved in [BJ11] that the decidability problem for the closed fragment of IL is PSPACE–hard. We consider the complexity problem for interpretability logic and prove that the system IL is PSPACE–complete. Our constructions can be seen as generalizations of the constructions by Boolos presented in [Boo96] (Chapter 10). If we restrict our work to GL, the resulting method is very similiar to the one given by Boolos, up to the terminology. Our method can also be seen as extending the method presented in [Sha10], of proving PSPACE– completeness (monomodal case), and has similarities with the proofs od completeness in [GJ08] and [GJ11]. We will comment on extending this approach to other interpretability logics.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Matematika
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
UIP-05-2017-9219
Ustanove:
Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet, Matematički odjel, Zagreb,
Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet, Zagreb