Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1031982
“Right to have rights” – who, where, today?
“Right to have rights” – who, where, today? // Sinking into the Mediterranean: Reading and Narrating the Refugee Crisis in Italy and Beyond
Split, Hrvatska, 2019. (predavanje, nije recenziran, sažetak, ostalo)
CROSBI ID: 1031982 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
“Right to have rights” – who, where, today?
Autori
Brčić Kuljiš, Marita ; Lunić, Anita
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, ostalo
Izvornik
Sinking into the Mediterranean: Reading and Narrating the Refugee Crisis in Italy and Beyond
/ - , 2019
Skup
Sinking into the Mediterranean: Reading and Narrating the Refugee Crisis in Italy and Beyond
Mjesto i datum
Split, Hrvatska, 20.10.2019
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Nije recenziran
Ključne riječi
Hannah Arendt, pravo na prava, migracije. ljudska prava
(Hannah Arendt, Right to have rights, migrations, human rights)
Sažetak
“The ultimate question in this case is how Europe should recognise that refugees have ‘the right to have rights’, to quote Hannah Arendt” Judge Pinto de Albuquerque.Case of Hirsi Jamaa and others v. Italy, The European Court of Human Rights Hannah Arendt used the expression ‘right to have rights’ while discussing the situation of those who found themselves deprived from any rights at all: “Once they had left their homeland they remained homeless, once they had left their state they became stateless ; once they had been deprived of their human rights they were rightless, the scum of the earth.“ (The Origins of Totalitarianism) The concept of ‘right to have rights’ which was born in the experience of the Second World War found it's way into contemporary legal discussions on the rights of refugees and immigrants. Even though forgotten for a significant period of time, this concept was revived by Seyla Benhabib (The Rights of Others) and further explored both in legal argumentation (e.g. US Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren) and theoretical discussions (Lefort, Moyn, Maxwell, Hunt et al.). Following on current debates, we would like to question: 1. a normative interpretation of the concept: interpreting “right” in the phrase as a moral foundation for the possibility of human rights (Benhabib, DeGooyer) 2. function and usability of the concept in the context of contemporary debates about our moral and legal obligation towards refugees and immigrants.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Filozofija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet u Splitu