Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1030807

Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?


Budimir, Ivan; Stojsavljević, Sanja; Baršić, Neven; Bišćanin, Alen; Mirošević, Gorana; Bohnec, Sven; Kirigin, Lora Stanka; Pavić, Tajana; Ljubičić, Neven
Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use? // World Journal of Gastroenterology, 23 (2017), 41; 7450-7458 doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7450 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, ostalo)


CROSBI ID: 1030807 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?

Autori
Budimir, Ivan ; Stojsavljević, Sanja ; Baršić, Neven ; Bišćanin, Alen ; Mirošević, Gorana ; Bohnec, Sven ; Kirigin, Lora Stanka ; Pavić, Tajana ; Ljubičić, Neven

Izvornik
World Journal of Gastroenterology (1007-9327) 23 (2017), 41; 7450-7458

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, ostalo

Ključne riječi
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Peptic ulcer bleeding, Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score, Baylor bleeding score

Sažetak
AIM To compare the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), Rockall score (RS) and Baylor bleeding score (BBS) in predicting clinical outcomes and need for interventions in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. METHODS Between January 2008 and December 2013, 1012 consecutive patients admitted with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) were prospectively followed. The pre-endoscopic RS, BBS and GBS, as well as the post-endoscopic diagnostic scores (RS and BBS) were calculated for all patients according to their urgent upper endoscopy findings. Area under the receiver-operating characteristics (AUROC) curves were calculated for the prediction of lethal outcome, rebleeding, needs for blood transfusion and/or surgical intervention, and the optimal cutoff values were evaluated. RESULTS PUB accounted for 41.9% of all upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, 5.2% patients died and 5.4% patients underwent surgery. By comparing the AUROC curves of the aforementioned pre-endoscopic scores, the RS best predicted lethal outcome (AUROC 0.82 vs 0.67 vs 0.63, respectively), but the GBS best predicted need for hospital-based intervention or 30-d mortality (AUROC 0.84 vs 0.57 vs 0.64), rebleeding (AUROC 0.75 vs 0.61 vs 0.53), need for blood transfusion (AUROC 0.83 vs 0.63 vs 0.58) and surgical intervention (0.82 vs 0.63 vs 0.52) The post-endoscopic RS was also better than the post- endoscopic BBS in predicting lethal outcome (AUROC 0.82 vs 0.69, respectively). CONCLUSION The RS is the best predictor of mortality and the GBS is the best predictor of rebleeding, need for blood transfusion and/or surgical intervention in patients with PUB. There is no one 'perfect score' and we suggest that these two tests be used concomitantly.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Biotehnologija u biomedicini (prirodno područje, biomedicina i zdravstvo, biotehničko područje)



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Zagreb,
KBC "Sestre Milosrdnice"

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Budimir, Ivan; Stojsavljević, Sanja; Baršić, Neven; Bišćanin, Alen; Mirošević, Gorana; Bohnec, Sven; Kirigin, Lora Stanka; Pavić, Tajana; Ljubičić, Neven
Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use? // World Journal of Gastroenterology, 23 (2017), 41; 7450-7458 doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7450 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, ostalo)
Budimir, I., Stojsavljević, S., Baršić, N., Bišćanin, A., Mirošević, G., Bohnec, S., Kirigin, L., Pavić, T. & Ljubičić, N. (2017) Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 23 (41), 7450-7458 doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7450.
@article{article, author = {Budimir, Ivan and Stojsavljevi\'{c}, Sanja and Bar\v{s}i\'{c}, Neven and Bi\v{s}\'{c}anin, Alen and Miro\v{s}evi\'{c}, Gorana and Bohnec, Sven and Kirigin, Lora Stanka and Pavi\'{c}, Tajana and Ljubi\v{c}i\'{c}, Neven}, year = {2017}, pages = {7450-7458}, DOI = {10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7450}, keywords = {Upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Peptic ulcer bleeding, Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score, Baylor bleeding score}, journal = {World Journal of Gastroenterology}, doi = {10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7450}, volume = {23}, number = {41}, issn = {1007-9327}, title = {Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?}, keyword = {Upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Peptic ulcer bleeding, Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score, Baylor bleeding score} }
@article{article, author = {Budimir, Ivan and Stojsavljevi\'{c}, Sanja and Bar\v{s}i\'{c}, Neven and Bi\v{s}\'{c}anin, Alen and Miro\v{s}evi\'{c}, Gorana and Bohnec, Sven and Kirigin, Lora Stanka and Pavi\'{c}, Tajana and Ljubi\v{c}i\'{c}, Neven}, year = {2017}, pages = {7450-7458}, DOI = {10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7450}, keywords = {Upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Peptic ulcer bleeding, Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score, Baylor bleeding score}, journal = {World Journal of Gastroenterology}, doi = {10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7450}, volume = {23}, number = {41}, issn = {1007-9327}, title = {Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?}, keyword = {Upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Peptic ulcer bleeding, Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score, Baylor bleeding score} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font