Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1028657
Evaluation of the results of the European Investigation Order
Evaluation of the results of the European Investigation Order // EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC) – Issue 3 / Duić, Dunja ; Petrašević, Tunjica ; Novokmet, Ante (ur.).
Osijek: University Josip Juraj Strossmayer of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2019. str. 492-506 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1028657 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Evaluation of the results of the European
Investigation Order
Autori
Karas, Željko ; Pejaković-Đipić, Silvija
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC) – Issue 3
/ Duić, Dunja ; Petrašević, Tunjica ; Novokmet, Ante - Osijek : University Josip Juraj Strossmayer of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2019, 492-506
ISBN
978-953-8109-29-4
Skup
International Scientific Conference EU and Member States – legal and economic issues 2019
Mjesto i datum
Osijek, Hrvatska, 06.06.2019. - 07.06.2019
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
European Investigation Order ; investigative measures ; police ; admissibility of evidence
(european Investigation Order ; investigative measures ; police ; admissibility of evidence)
Sažetak
Authors are researching development and analyzing first effects of cross-border investigative measures, following enactment of the European Investigation Order (EIO). The EIO extends number of investigative actions which can be requested from other countries, and simplifies the process of evidence transfer. The paper is discussing problems during development of the EIO, its’ reception in Croatian system and a case study of the first orders received in Croatian police in 2018 is performed. This instrument is not imposing common legislative standards, but introducing the principle of mutual recognition which is derived from other law fields. The main risk is that diversity of some investigative measures could lead to the inadmissibility of evidence in subsequent criminal procedure. Results are showing that there hadn’t been obstacles in police practice so far. Main issues on principle of mutual recognition, double criminality or admissibility of evidence were not manifested in case study, but research indicates areas of potential problems.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Interdisciplinarne društvene znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
MUP, Policijska akademija "Prvi hrvatski redarstvenik", Veleučilište kriminalistike i javne sigurnosti
