Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1027588
Ten-year evaluation of the implementation of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Action Plan
Ten-year evaluation of the implementation of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Action Plan // Proceedings of the IX Workshop of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Expert Group / Champagnon, Jocelyn ; Kralj, Jelena ; Cano Alonso, Luis Santiago ; Sundar, K. S. Gopi (ur.).
Arles: IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group, 2019. str. 13-18 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1027588 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Ten-year evaluation of the implementation of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Action Plan
Autori
Kralj, Jelena ; Pigniczki, Csaba ; de Goeij, Petra ; Champagnon, Jocelyn
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Proceedings of the IX Workshop of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Expert Group
/ Champagnon, Jocelyn ; Kralj, Jelena ; Cano Alonso, Luis Santiago ; Sundar, K. S. Gopi - Arles : IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group, 2019, 13-18
ISBN
978-2-491451-00-4
Skup
9th Workshop of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Expert Group
Mjesto i datum
Houmt El Souk, Tunis, 15.11.2018. - 17.11.2018
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
Action plan evaluation ; Conservation ; Legislation ; Management ; Research
Sažetak
The East Atlantic and Central European populations evaluated 24 and 27 different actions, respectively, and obtained very similar average scores (± SD) of 2.3 ± 1.1 and 2.1 ± 0.9. In both populations, legislation actions had the highest implementation scores. The lowest scores were obtained for management activities in the East Atlantic population and research activities in the Central European one. The comparison of scoring during last three ESIEG meetings showed the increase of legislation activities in the East Atlantic population, but surprisingly, also the decrease in management and research actions. Comparing the implementation scores with priorities, it is visible that for both populations higher priority actions had lower implementation, indicating the need for better implementation of the highest priority actions.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Biologija