Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1024829
Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis
Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis // International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 1803 (2019), e1803, 11 doi:10.1002/mpr.1803 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1024829 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability
using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in
pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis
(Comparison of major depression diagnostic
classification probability using the SCID,
CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among
women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual
participant data meta‐analysis)
Autori
Levis, Brooke ; McMillan, Dean ; Sun, Ying ; He, Chen ; Rice, Danielle B. ; Krishnan, Ankur ; Wu, Yin ; Azar, Marleine ; Sanchez, Tatiana A. ; Chiovitti, Matthew J. ; Bhandari, Parash Mani ; Neupane, Dipika ; Saadat, Nazanin ; Riehm, Kira E. ; Imran, Mahrukh ; Boruff, Jill T. ; Cuijpers, Pim ; Gilbody, Simon ; Ioannidis, John P.A. ; Kloda, Lorie A. ; Patten, Scott B. ; Shrier, Ian ; Ziegelstein, Roy C. ; Comeau, Liane ; Mitchell, Nicholas D. ; Tonelli, Marcello ; Vigod, Simone N. ; Aceti, Franca ; Alvarado, Rubén ; Alvarado‐Esquivel, Cosme ; Bakare, Muideen O. ; Barnes, Jacqueline ; Beck, Cheryl Tatano ; Bindt, Carola ; Boyce, Philip M. ; Bunevicius, Adomas ; Couto, Tiago Castro e ; Chaudron, Linda H. ; Correa, Humberto ; Figueiredo, Felipe Pinheiro ; Eapen, Valsamma ; Fernandes, Michelle ; Figueiredo, Barbara ; Fisher, Jane R.W. ; Garcia‐Esteve, Lluïsa ; Giardinelli, Lisa ; Helle, Nadine ; Howard, Louise M. ; Khalifa, Dina Sami ; Kohlhoff, Jane ; Kusminskas, Laima ; Kozinszky, Zoltán ; Lelli, Lorenzo ; Leonardou, Angeliki A. ; Lewis, Beth A. ; Maes, Michael ; Meuti, Valentina ; Nakić Radoš, Sandra ; Navarro García, Purificación ; Nishi, Daisuke ; Okitundu Luwa E‐Andjafono, Daniel ; Robertson‐ Blackmore, Emma ; Rochat, Tamsen J. ; Rowe, Heather J. ; Siu, Bonnie W.M. ; Skalkidou, Alkistis ; Stein, Alan ; Stewart, Robert C. ; Su, Kuan‐Pin ; Sundström‐Poromaa, Inger ; Tadinac, Meri ; Tandon, S. Darius ; Tendais, Iva ; Thiagayson, Pavaani ; Töreki, Annamária ; Torres‐Giménez, Anna ; Tran, Thach D. ; Trevillion, Kylee ; Turner, Katherine ; Vega‐ Dienstmaier, Johann M. ; Wynter, Karen ; Yonkers, Kimberly A. ; Benedetti, Andrea ; Thombs, Brett D.
Izvornik
International journal of methods in psychiatric research (1049-8931) 1803
(2019);
E1803, 11
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
depressive disorders, diagnostic interviews ; Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale ; individualparticipant data meta-analysis ; major depression
Sažetak
Objectives: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient HealthQuestionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. Methods: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), CompositeInternational Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM(SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics. Results:Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2, 532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2, 948 participants, 194 major depression cases ; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID(28 studies, 7, 403 participants, 1, 027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI(interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95%CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. Conclusion: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Psihologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
MZOS-130-0000000-3294 - Provjera evolucijskog modela prilagodbe i zdravlja (Tadinac, Meri, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)
MZOS-134-0000000-2421 - Postpartalna depresija – čimbenici rizika, rano otkrivanje i terapijski pristup (Herman, Radoslav, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb,
Hrvatsko katoličko sveučilište, Zagreb
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE